Originally published at: Kacsmaryk Transfers Mifepristone Case To Court Made Up Of Mostly Trump Judges
Arch-conservative federal district court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, with much vitriol aimed at the Supreme Court, begrudgingly transferred a major attack on mifepristone’s legality out of his court Tuesday night — claiming to arbitrarily choose instead a district court composed almost entirely of Trump appointees. “The Court need not strain to determine the best forum,” he…
1 Like
Somebody is going to have to realize that the POSs that put these people in power now started this campaign back in the days of the New Deal.
They have literally raised a generation of second rate intellects with a vicious, racist streak, bound to deliver the desires of an oligarchy that never quit since the days before the Great Depression.
There is an ugly, brutal animal curled round the heart of our nation that predate independence even. The same people that maintained the LIBOR rate and every other NY-LON advantage for white protestant men since our founding.
13 Likes
Now judges are judge shopping?? WTF??
17 Likes
“Decades of Supreme Court precedent led every jurist who assessed this case to conclude that the Original Plaintiffs had a jurisdictionally valid case,” he wrote. “The Supreme Court reinterpreted those precedents and thereby ratified the Government’s contradictory arguments to hold otherwise.”
You are wrong, there, Judge Fuckwad. The Supreme Court’s precedent for standing has not changed, at least since Justice Gorsuck joined the Supemes: “We gonna do what we wanna cause we gonna.”
7 Likes
It is “Hang ‘em All” Kacsmaryk after all; why are you surprised? He’s as much of a judge as I am, which is to say not at all.
7 Likes
Is Kacsmaryk intent on securing this year’s Madison Cawthorn Prize for Shitting Where You Eat?
7 Likes
Judge who were previously parties to the case? No problem if you’re a republican.
9 Likes
I’m going to need Dr. Joyce Vance to explain how this action came about. How can the judge transfer the case to another judicial district, and how does he have a choice of which court? Futhermore I simply don’t understand the paragraph where he criticizes the Supreme Court and the system for an outcome he was unable to control. Vitriol explains the tone, but I don’t follow the logic.
3 Likes
Whatever happened to the wheelchair wing nut?
1 Like
Cawthorn lost renomination in the 2022 Republican primary to Chuck Edwards, who won the general election.[4][5] In October 2025, Cawthorn announced a campaign to return to Congress, running in Florida’s 19th congressional district.[6] [Madison Cawthorn - Wikipedia]
5 Likes
They’re still sore about that other Roosevelt guy and his pesky anti-monopoly trust busting.
2 Likes