OK. YMMV. Comment histories are open to all. The evidence is available for your perusal – both the content, and the replies, and who’s uprated the posts. Long-termers round here, including greybeards like me, get it. If you don’t want to get it, well, that’s on you. eustace’s post here was uprated by 3 long-termers. Yours was not. The one I linked to earlier received 34. Or there’s this one, from, well, 6 hours ago. 24 uprates. You can see for yourself who’s doing the uprating. That should tell you something – the operative word being “should”. Lead a horse to water, and all that. You can learn, or not. Nobody can force you.
I’ve provided ample evidence that eustace’s posts are snark and parody of alt-righties. You can like it or not. You have no basis, however, for claiming that eustace intends it seriously – which was the basis of your original comment, and which is what I was correcting. Whether you like it or not, eustace knows perfectly well when Justice Stevens ignored it. If you don’t like the snark, you can ignore it. But the rest of us actually get it, and your public “taking it seriously” will only subject you to mockery. The choice is yours.