A federal judge rejected ex-Trump legal adviser John Eastman’s attempt to quash the House Jan. 6 select committee’s subpoena to Chapman University requesting his work emails from when he was a law professor at the school — where he worked as he was trying to help then-President Donald Trump steal the 2020 election.
The judge has ordered a lighting fast review of “privilege” for Eastman’s emails, and given that the guy used his 5th amendment rights 146 times… I wonder if some of those emails might not be, you know, incriminating. IANAL, but my understanding is that you can’t claim client-attorney privilege if the topic under discussion was a prospective crime. Part of the order itself is reproduced in the linked tweet.