About time. That whole organization should be testifying about 1000 other things, then disbanded and built back up as a completely modernized and accountable agency.
Musk along with the official Twitter Verified account announced on Mar. 23 that the social media company would set a deadline of Apr. 1 for verified users to apply and keep their status. Those who refused to pay the $8 per month subscription for individuals or $1,000 per month for organizations would begin to lose both their blue check mark and verified status.
In a tweet reply, Musk revealed that this could include the New York Times should it refuse to pay for a subscription. Shortly afterward, the publication’s main Twitter account lost its verified status.
and the the truth comes out
NY Times is being incredible hypocritical here, as they are super aggressive about forcing everyone to pay *their* subscription
DeMOnrat Libtards are PeDos becauSE all the talk about IS Sex, SEx seX. They’rE obsesseD with FAKE genders, and incluSive poliCies, and TurninG boYS into girLS and girLS into BoYS. ThEy are OBsessed with drag SHows and Wanting boYS drESSed like GirLS to Groom kiDs . They WAnt to tEach Sex ed in schOOLS So ThaT kids waNt to have sex anD theN get aborTions.
Major oil powers led by Saudi Arabia announced a surprise production cut of more than one million barrels per day on Sunday, calling it a “precautionary” move aimed at stabilising the market.
Did Trump Himself Rifle Through MAL Docs After Grand Jury Subpoena?
Trump had Walt Nauta (and others) move boxes for him. Walt denied it at first. Then the FBI showed him the video. He confessed. But Trump is keeping him on, anyway.
Walt likely moved the boxes right up into Trump’s office. At Trump’s direction.
We know that the information was disclosed while the indictment itself remains sealed and before any official announcement was made or charges brought. It is unlikely that the leak came from the Trump team, which seemed genuinely surprised.
The most likely, though uncertain, scenario is that a person in Mr. Bragg’s office or a grand juror unlawfully leaked the sealed information. That would be a class E felony, subject to imprisonment.
Just wondering
Does this apply to SC justices as well???