Iowa Caucuses App Couldn’t Handle Complexity, Experts Say | Talking Points Memo

I thought that was Jared.

6 Likes

Not so sure Iowa can handle the complexity

1 Like

Shadow used a free tier for the platform on which the app was based, giving it reduced capacity.

8 Likes

From The Verge article:

That means Shadow didn’t even pony up for the TestFairy plan that comes with single sign-on authentication, unlimited data retention, and end-to-end encryption. Instead, it looks like the company used the version of TestFairy anyone can try for free, which deletes any app data after 30 days and limits the number of test users that can access the app to 200.

SERIOUSLY??? THE IOWA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY PAID THESE CLOWNS $60,000 FOR THIS???

9 Likes

Hannity is never behind. He’s always just in front, on his knees, about an inch and a half away.

Oh goody. Limbo and Miriam Adelson, who got one for being a big donor, can compare notes.

4 Likes

Any idea of what the “platform” is that was mentioned?

That was an interesting point as well. That little?

What complexity? It’s three sets of numbers for up to five candidates, plus a precinct id.

2 Likes

With the same medical diagno… Oh, you meant with the award? Never mind. (Damn)

1 Like

Careful, I can see a battle between generations coming on.

Every indication is that people who are turned off by trumPP, and there are a ton of them, are going to vote for a Democrat, Iowa caucus mess notwithstanding. Eight months to election day, and all will be resolved no later than this summer. Don’t forget that Rich was a producer of Veep so he might think all political machinations run along the lines of a TV show with backstabbing, incompetence, etc. Let’s just Keep Calm and Vote.

6 Likes

I suspect the thing that eventually fills the void left by Millennials’ (and others’) disaffection with organized religion will be Technology.

It truly seems to be the rising Global Religion at this point. It’s spoken of in messianic terms, as the thing that will eventually solve all human problems like disease, global warming, and hunger. It has its own cults, like Apple; its own gurus, like Zuckerberg; and its own megachurches, like Twitter.

It even has “fundamentalists” who deny reality when it contradicts technology. What happens when a calculator or spreadsheet – with inherent floating-point number errors – gives a different result than pencil and paper? Almost everyone rejects the knowledge of their own senses and believes the error, because "Computers don’t make mistakes!”

I’m increasingly disheartened as humans blindly turn over more and more of their lives, fate, and future to cold, lifeless, unthinking machines that they (and those with a whopping financial interest in such things) have romantically anthropomorphized.

And I say that as a guy who’s run a successful IT business for most of his adult life!

7 Likes

Thanks for asking, I was wondering the same thing.

Anyone who has passed a DBA class should be able to build that model pretty easily.

1 Like

That is not necesarily or even often true. Open source platforms enjoy the “many eyes” and “many deployments” effect: whatever problem you’re having, chances are someone has seen it before and is happy to talk about it.

Now if you’re talking about the free demoware from a commercial provider, on the other hand… good luck.

1 Like

“If cars ran like computers, we’d all still be riding horses.” - Me, often, IT professional for…a long time.

3 Likes

Yes, that was when some advanced thinkers tried to download the app the day before the caucuses.

3 Likes

I wonder if in the future the next President can have everything that Trump bestowed, enacted, proposed, asterisked? I foresee a blizzard of asterisks coming after he’s gone, how ever long that takes.

3 Likes

Don’t forget the dominican blue dots.

1 Like

Saint Hal?

2 Likes