Ingraham Issues Correction | Talking Points Memo

FOX is playing the cynical game of having double deniability - if it turns out one way, then “We have always supported Trump” - and if it goes the other way “We were among the first to see the problem”. And at this point, I will take it.

Downward Dog

1 Like

That will be tough. Most Fox employees are incapable of rational thought.

2 Likes

So what if he were a “liberal partisan”? How would that change the basic, unchallenged facts of the case -that Trump has already admitted to?

4 Likes

She schtupped Dinesh D’Felon.

It is all but impossible to go any lower.

4 Likes

For who?

2 Likes

Ingraham is just parroting what they tell her to say. No substance, with minimal style of the blind and spiteful variety. She doesn’t care because, Hy, the pay’s great.

Both of them—although she’s ever so slightly more human than he is, even though it’s a very low bar.

1 Like

Not reformulated, communicated. As in the Fox lawyers communicated to her bosses. Who then communicated to her.

2 Likes

True that. What is going on over there? This can’t be a new policy, because each “show” (as opposed to news broadcast), would have to dedicate airtime to correcting the false reporting from the day before.

She looks uncomfortable-makes me wonder if this whole network knows it is on thin ice given the staggering amount awarded to that poor family whose son was murdered.

1 Like

It’s spelled “fuhrners” according to my RWNJ Dictionary.

Curious. Why would Ingraham issue a correction? I thought it was only ethical journalists who did that.

That was literally the most ‘hostage-like’ line-reading she has ever done.

I-apologize-for-my-mistake. Well BOO HOO, Laura.

1 Like

Laura Ingraham will never be forgotten for that Nazi-style salute. She can claim it’s a WAVE all she wants.

1 Like

So if I understand the new way of reasoning…

Any claims by someone registered to another political party are now automatically partisan.

Any claims from anyone within your own party who hires someone affiliated with the other party are automatically partisan.

Any claims by anyone within your own party who ever lost an election for an elected office you won are automatically partisan for the other party.

What’s going on…? The rebuttal and correction was so strong they had to respond and correct. I like this guy, the whistleblower is in good hands.

:rofl:

1 Like

Do I have to? Really?

3 Likes

Laura Ingraham: I wanna say here, because I know you people keep track of this, some secretly, some out in the open, but for the record here it is: I’d do her.

That reasoning, absurd as it is started with tRump and the Muller investigation where he tried to convince the US, and did convince his lesions of swallowers, that he was entitled to all Republican investigators!!! Hardly anyone noticed!! You are entitled to an impartial JURY, there has never been any right to such and such investigation!!!