The Indiana official in charge of mediating public access disputes came down against the municipally-owned hospital corporation for deciding to petition the Supreme Court behind closed doors.
Incredible, I had no idea there was such internal controversy within the organization over the decision to appeal to the Supreme Court.
And that despite the controversy raging across the country over the potential implications of an adverse decision, all was calm among the hospital’s executive staff.
HHC’s lawyer had argued that the board delegated its legal decisions to executive staff,
I thought republicans were adamantly opposed to delegating authority. I have vague recollections of the US Supreme Court issuing opinions along those lines rather recently.
O/T but related to SCOTUS, and of interest to those of us who like having a few wetlands around, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Sackett v EPA (aka Sackett II) on Monday. Stay tuned.
That would be one major dereliction of duty. Even if you accept the premise that the board delegated the day-to-day management or oversight of the case to its executive staff the staff would periodically report back to the board. There is no way in hell the staff should have unsupervised authority over a Supreme Court case.
Yes, all that. But you could just like the sound of frogs chirping on an early summer evening, the occasional turtle or wood duck, to consider this a significant issue.