given the ideas that underlie the concept of executive privilege, the assertion that a President can only make privilege claims for federal employees is debateable, at the very least. AFAIK, there are no Supreme Court precedents that establish that non-employee advisors are ineligible for executive privilege claims.
In other words, I fully expect that Trump will object to Lewandowskiâs testimony, based on some bizarro world version of executive privilege (like âimmunityâ) and that there will be no hearings. And it will take until November for Nadler to get around to even filing a civil suit to force compliance.
And given the slow-walk that Nadler is doing on Grand Jury materials, and his âend of the yearâ deadline, its pretty clear that weâre looking at kayfabe. Nadler ânegotiatedâ a schedule that prevents any oral arguments prior to Sept 30, and unless the court decides to issue a decision without a hearing, there wonât be a decision until mid October â and that is only the START of the process, because of appeals â the odds are overwhelming that the committee wonât even get the grand jury materials it needs before the end of the yearâŚ