House Democrats subpoenaed Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal attorney, on Monday, seeking documents related to his recent endeavors in Ukraine seeking dirt on a Trump political rival.
Can The Ghoul and Mango Mussolini credibly claim Executive Privilege and/or lawyer confidentiality?
He’s already said he will not cooperate. What are the sanctions for not complying with a congressional subpoena?
Showtime Rudy. Showtime! It’s how heroes are made.
$50 says his initial response is “Eff you!”
Igor Kolomoisky is mentioned in the subpoena.
A sneak preview of Rudy’s upcoming appearance on Judge “Jugs” Pirro’s FoxNews show:
DentureGate! DentureGate! DentureGate!
Hey, Rudy! I think they just might fix your bottom teeth in prison for free!
Doesn’t Rudy have a lifetime 9/11 escape clause?
The Eleven O’Clock Evening Noose.
This is awesome! Still, if House Democrats had any balls at all they’d subpoena his children and his dentist and ask, “Why do you hate him so much?”
Can he just send his phone in his place? ‘It’s all on there’, afterall.
It says in the letter his lack of cooperation would be seen as obstruction of the House impeachment inquiry and result in an “adverse inference” against Rudes and POTUS.
I’m not a lawyer, but I don’t see how he can claim Executive privilege when Guliani’s not even a part of government, let alone the Executive Branch.
As far as attorney-client privilege, one wonders what private interest did Trump have requiring his private attorney to become involved. It’s obviously his 2020 campaign, but I don’t think he wants to cop to that.
By commingling government policy with his personal needs (presidential campaign 2020), I think he’s hard pressed on both claims.
Rudy may not care about an adverse inference if what he withholds is a helluva lot more damaging than hanging that threat over his head.
Oh boy! And the hits keep coming. Mike Pompeo apparently took part in that Trump-Zelensky conversation.
Hmm…that’s something the summary didn’t tell us or allude to. I wonder what else we don’t know.
The subpoena only asks for the production of documents. No testimony yet.
Y’all thought I was joking about the “promise” end of all of this.
It’s going to be that they were going to get the IMF out of the way of him regaining Privatbank.
How do you know these things???