This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1239006
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1239006
OT, but check the grammar in the headline. If the subject is “each candidate,” then it needs to say “distinguished himself/herself.” Or, “Here’s How the Candidates Distinguished Themselves.” There, I feel better . . . .
I missed the debate. What is the big take away nobody is talking about?
the same as last week’s conclusions, RON
well, that debate will thin out the herd quickly.
Hope the same happens tomorrow night.
get it down to 5 and then maybe they can seriously get into a debate that will allow us to have serious conclusions as to each candidates qualifications to being president.
That was frustrating.
I’m going with, a bunch of cackling hens needing a rooster to clean house. lol
they ALL have distinguished themselves as being Good Democratic U>S>Presidential Primary Candidates. TBS> surely.
Or, y’know, just fuckin’ weird.
Hello, I’m Bernie Sanders. And NOW I’M GOING TO YELL AT YOU ABOUT DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM AND WAVE MY FINGER WILDLY IN YOUR GENERAL DIRECTION!
Discobot is quite pleonastic tonight.
Thanks for the addition to my vocabulary😏
Shit … I’m lucky if I can remember half the ones I’ve already got –
She obviously has the speaking chops and she sounded a tad better than some of the guys on that stage.
However, she literally rushed her answers through and that’s something that won’t be changing anytime soon.
Those moments that has some experts wanting to buy her brochure, were also punctuated with ‘kook moments’.
Yet another unintentioned result of the party geniuses who decided Clinton should run unopposed in 2016. Sanders would have been one of the candidates polling at 1-2% if the field was even half the size of the one now. He certainly wouldn’t be strutting around like one of the favorites this time around.
Join the 21st Century! Language changes.
I thought there was no way in hell GWB would be elected to a second term. I look at this field and pray history doesn’t repeat itself. Nominate someone willing to get in lardassess face and beat him at his own game.
Many of the B team targeted Bernie last night:
I’ve been leaning toward Warren, more and more strongly, but recently the problem of Medicare for All has given me pause, and after last night I’m not sure I can support her. Medicare for All is a laudable goal, but it’s not clear that it will be good policy without a lot of time to work out problems. More immediately, we can see that Medicare for All is bad politics. Imagine Trump–of all people!–crying out, “They’re coming for your healthcare!” And he will. (He may use that cry whatever is in the Democratic platform, but that’s another issue.) Warren, in particular, is vulnerable on Medicare for All. Here’s a former Harvard professor telling Americans that she knows what’s good for them better than they do. That doesn’t just sound elitist, it IS elitism. Not a good way to win hearts and minds, or votes. (Full disclosure: I’m an alum of the school she taught at before running for the Senate.)
I’m much more comfortable with Pete Buttigieg’s Medicare for All Who Want It, which is not only better politics than Medicare for All, but probably better policy for the short- and medium-term.
