Here’s How Each Candidate Distinguished Themselves | Talking Points Memo

Elizabeth Warren distinguished herself, as usual, for her ideas. She was helped by debate moderators who seemed to like asking the other candidates to comment on Warren’s proposals. Her attack on John Delaney is likely to be talked about tomorrow: “I don’t understand why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for President of the United States just to talk about what we really can’t do and shouldn’t fight for.” After a largely unmemorable first debate, Bernie Sanders came out swinging this time, not hesitating to call out his debate-stage rivals and even the moderators. For a significant, early part of the debate, he and Warren together defended their ambitious health care plans. Notably, he and Warren did not turn on one another, as many pundits predicted. Tim Ryan didn’t get much time, and his efforts to distinguish himself as a guy from a Trump-voting state didn’t come to the forefront. He did draw one of the many rebukes Sanders was dishing out: At one point, when he challenged whether Medicare For All would deliver certain services for senior citizens, Sanders replied, “I do know it, I wrote the damn bill.” Beto O’Rourke continues to struggle to gain traction after his initial burst of attention. He did, however, seem to come prepared to talk policy on such issues as health care and reparations, perhaps in an effort to combat what some have claimed is a lack of depth./td> Amy Klobucher stood out among the more moderate candidates, distinguishing herself with a denunciation of the NRA. John Hickenlooper was in many ways upstaged by new entrant and fellow governor Steve Bullock. He didn’t get much time, but, with the time he got, it seemed clear he had pivoted away from attacks on Democrats to his left. He said he “respects” Warren and Sanders. What Hickenlooper had pivoted to was less clear. Delaney adopted the posture of debate pit bull right from the start, calling out Sanders and Warren by name. Moderators seemed to frame him as the token centrist, playing him off various candidates to his left, which had the effect of giving him the major-candidate treatment (he’s tied in the polls with de Blasio.) Pete Buttigieg didn’t do much to help or hurt himself this time around. We noted his references to, and the question he got about, his relatively young age. (Given the opportunity by a moderator, he declined to criticize Sanders’ age.) He also, as part of a conversation about countering the gun lobby, laid out some changes he’d seek to democracy: ending the Electoral College, making Washington, D.C., a state and changing the number of seats on the Supreme Court. Tonight was many viewers’ first introduction to Steve Bullock. He was given a lot of time and staked out his territory as the One Guy On The Stage Who Won In A Trump State After being accused of being too wacky back in June, Marianne Williamson was on firmer ground tonight. Sort of. Her self-help style wavers between a breath of fresh air on the debate stage and weird. She did get some big applause lines, notably when talking about environmental racism in Flint.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1239006

“Her self-help style wavers between a breath of fresh air on the debate stage and weird.

5 Likes

OT, but check the grammar in the headline. If the subject is “each candidate,” then it needs to say “distinguished himself/herself.” Or, “Here’s How the Candidates Distinguished Themselves.” There, I feel better . . . .

2 Likes

3 Likes

I missed the debate. What is the big take away nobody is talking about?

1 Like

the same as last week’s conclusions, RON

well, that debate will thin out the herd quickly.
Hope the same happens tomorrow night.
get it down to 5 and then maybe they can seriously get into a debate that will allow us to have serious conclusions as to each candidates qualifications to being president.
That was frustrating.

3 Likes

I’m going with, a bunch of cackling hens needing a rooster to clean house. lol

they ALL have distinguished themselves as being Good Democratic U>S>Presidential Primary Candidates. TBS> surely.

1 Like

Or, y’know, just fuckin’ weird.

1 Like

Hello, I’m Bernie Sanders. And NOW I’M GOING TO YELL AT YOU ABOUT DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM AND WAVE MY FINGER WILDLY IN YOUR GENERAL DIRECTION!

17 Likes

Discobot is quite pleonastic tonight.

2 Likes

Thanks for the addition to my vocabulary😏

1 Like

Shit … I’m lucky if I can remember half the ones I’ve already got –

She obviously has the speaking chops and she sounded a tad better than some of the guys on that stage.

However, she literally rushed her answers through and that’s something that won’t be changing anytime soon.

Those moments that has some experts wanting to buy her brochure, were also punctuated with ‘kook moments’.

Yet another unintentioned result of the party geniuses who decided Clinton should run unopposed in 2016. Sanders would have been one of the candidates polling at 1-2% if the field was even half the size of the one now. He certainly wouldn’t be strutting around like one of the favorites this time around.

2 Likes

Join the 21st Century! Language changes.

I thought there was no way in hell GWB would be elected to a second term. I look at this field and pray history doesn’t repeat itself. Nominate someone willing to get in lardassess face and beat him at his own game.

Many of the B team targeted Bernie last night:

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1156376324828647424

I’ve been leaning toward Warren, more and more strongly, but recently the problem of Medicare for All has given me pause, and after last night I’m not sure I can support her. Medicare for All is a laudable goal, but it’s not clear that it will be good policy without a lot of time to work out problems. More immediately, we can see that Medicare for All is bad politics. Imagine Trump–of all people!–crying out, “They’re coming for your healthcare!” And he will. (He may use that cry whatever is in the Democratic platform, but that’s another issue.) Warren, in particular, is vulnerable on Medicare for All. Here’s a former Harvard professor telling Americans that she knows what’s good for them better than they do. That doesn’t just sound elitist, it IS elitism. Not a good way to win hearts and minds, or votes. (Full disclosure: I’m an alum of the school she taught at before running for the Senate.)

I’m much more comfortable with Pete Buttigieg’s Medicare for All Who Want It, which is not only better politics than Medicare for All, but probably better policy for the short- and medium-term.

8 Likes