What would be an example of a criminal legitimate legislative purpose?
Hope all is okay in your neck of the woods plucky! I wish you could send some of that rain my way tho.
It is very consistent with MAGA actions. They only care about something if it impacts them directly and personally, then EVERYONE else must do what they say. Otherwise, it is Stateās Rights or Federal Rights, depending on which they personally agree with.
Simple. Proxmireās case was heard when there were actual Justices on the Supreme Court. Grahamās case will be heard by Political Hacks (with 3 exceptions).
What would be an example of a speech or debate held on the Senate floor that Lindsay Graham could be forced to testify about?
That would of course depend on the legal theory you asserted that there can be criminal legitimate legislative purposes. Seems to me itās an oxymoron to call something both criminal and also a legitimate legislative purpose, so I await your clarifying examples of this
ETA: Thereās also no reason to limit investigation to things said on the Senate floor. Grahamās covos with Raffy asking him to discover āa more favorable outcome for Trumpā were by phone. Graham might have been anywhere when he placed those calls
Their argument seems to be that he was too emotionally overwrought to have meant any of his acting out.
Glad there was one sane person in that family.
Yes. Wasnāt he the one who got Cindy McCain to invite the Plastic Princess to McCainās funeral?
Lindsay, on the Senate floor: āIt is imperative that we defeat this tax bill, which is why I am instructing my chief of staff to execute the majority leader, who we kidnapped earlier today.ā
DOJ: Subpoena to testify to the grand jury.
Lindsay: āFuck you, Fifth Amendment.ā
DOJ: Grants transactional immunity.
Lindsay: āNevertheless, Iām not testifying about my speech. Speech or debate clause, suck it bitches.ā
DOJ: Curses, foiled!
That was nice
(cause muricaā¦)
OT: I have been super busy as some of you know and I have this week off before starting another project.
I present Winston, Mooās orphan boy.
White supremacy, obvs.
Leslie Graham is one of the Queen MAGATS (Trump Supporters)!
They believe in sovereignty of the ruler!
Supreme sovereignty of MAGATS is derived from the brown nectar which is found between the pillowy mounds of Trumpās asscrack! Like honey to a bee!
Lickers! Graham is a criminal. Nose as brown as chocolate!
Glad to be vote 50 on this comment!
Thatās not Winston. Thatās Black Phillip.
(Great little flick if you care at all about the details of 16th Century history of New England witchcraft.)
Well, FWIW my interpretation was that the difference was the colour of the Presidentās skin. This was obviously driving (and continues to drive) Republicans collectively nuts, so they could be expected to do things theyād never have considered in the past, even up to and including crashing the U.S. economy to make him look bad. Once this became even a flirting possibility, the risk to the markets goes up correspondingly.
Now, do I rule out portions of the Elite Economic Infrastructure doing things just to hurt their opposition (pronounced āenemiesā)? Absolutely not - itās just the Occamās Razor in me kicking in, since the demonstrated insanity of Republicans has since been confirmed and carved in stoneā¦
And to his credit, he pulled it off - it took him eight years, but he pulled it off!
āWe can expect this to have a devastating effect on the Stock Market in the coming weeks as investors see profits in the Energy Sector plumment, likely pulling down profits in sectors throughout the Supply Chain!ā
Or heās going to cut himself off from them until they ever come to their senses. Iāve seen this sort of thing play out a couple of times in my world and the best thing is actually to do just that. You find your family and companionship amongst those who welcome you and ignore those who would cause you harm (to be honest, Iām only really familiar with the āemotional harmā stuff, but the technique works well in both casesā¦ )