The GOP reportedly agreed to fund up to $1.6 million of former President Trump’s legal bills to fight probes into his business practices in New York, according to the Washington Post.
. . . Record of achievement?
Seriously?
I didn’t see the DNC paying for Clinton’s legal fees re: Monica.
I didn’t see the DNC funding Hillary’s server responses.
Are random cash flows into and out of RNC coffers completely free of campaign finance laws? This makes sense for the RNC business-wise but is it legal for RNC to pay Drump’s random personal expenses?
I bet the entire GOP is afraid of what might happen if they refuse to pay his ‘personal’ lawyer bills.
Second bet: those lawyers would not get paid otherwise.
Imagine the uproar and outrage if the DNC had funded all of the post-presidency private legal bills the Clintons racked up because of Ken Starr’s prurient witch hunt.
Which would have been justified, because this is straight up kleptocratic theft, corruption on a scale that shocks when considered in the context of standard democratic norms. But the MSM just shrugs its shoulders and nods savvily because Republican corruption is just assumed and therefore Old News.
Shouldn’t the RNC be forced to change its name to the Trump Criminal Defense Fund at this point?
Also, if I were a Republican candidate for office, I might be upset that funding that should go to my campaign is instead, flowing to a billionaire (allegedly). I might also be upset were I a donor.