In February 2022, Special Counsel John Durham inserted what seemed to be a bombshell allegation into an otherwise drab court filing: a firm paid by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign had accessed White House data.
On Newsmax TV, sometimes Trump attorney and former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani jumped on it, claiming to have similar — perhaps starker — evidence of Clinton’s corruption. “I happen to have it in my bedroom, or my den, actually,” Giuliani said. “I’ve had it there for years.”
Right next to the orders by Sec. Clinton on Uranium One letterhead to hide ACORN’s private emails to Antifa headquarters in the basement of Comet Pizza which ran an international trade in fetal body parts established to fund the Benghazi cover-up staged to kill witnesses to the murder of Vince Foster who knew too much about insider trading of cattle futures after she gave birth to the alien baby.
After 3 years, this is the best Durham has, and this case will fail quickly at trial. The main thing that is lacking is real evidence of a crime, unlike what the Manhattan DA has.
Things will get real when these matters enter a courtroom and people are under oath, and Durham will have to at least present himself as an honest member of the court.
If there is ever, God forbid, another Republican president, we’ll probably see a special counsel moving heaven and earth to find a connection between Chelsea and the kidnaping of the Lindbergh baby because evidently the Clinton family hasn’t been harassed enough yet by rogue elements of the judicial system. Isn’t there some mechanism to formally assess the continuing need for this thing that was never needed in the first damn place?
“If third parties or members of the media have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information,” Durham wrote.