DOJ: Congress Can’t Sue If Prez Orders Treasury To Pays For Everyone’s Health Care | Talking Points Memo

U.S. appellate judge Merrick Garland pushed the Justice Department to the logical extremes of its defense of President Trump by getting a DOJ lawyer to say that Congress couldn’t sue if an administration on its own decided to pay for uninsured people’s health care.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1306286
1 Like

DOJ: Congress Can’t Sue If Prez Orders Treasury To Pays For Everyone’s Health Care

That’s right. They can’t “sue.”

But, they can “sues.”

6 Likes

Start jamming Nancy!

44 Likes

Merrick Garland -I love this.

58 Likes

Clarification: Congress can’t sue a Republican president. Or, a king, whichever comes first.

54 Likes

Cute little experiment we had with Democracy for a couple hundred years. Was nice while it lasted.

54 Likes

Where in the hell did this one come from?

So we’re getting universal health care by fiat? Someone wanna tell #ditchMoscowMitch that?

20 Likes

Excuse me. Doesn’t the purse belong to Congress? The executive can only spend what Congress authorizes?

47 Likes

Doesn’t apply if the president is a republican. Until we finally regain control of the Supremes in, oh, 50 years.

36 Likes

That was before the Age of the Trump Enlightenment. The Supreme Court has already endorsed Trump’s right to reallocate funds for his Hallowed Wall.

32 Likes

Merrick Garland is saying " Your’e asking moi? " :+1:

24 Likes

While kinda funny to see, conservatives will just change their minds as soon as it’s convenient for them to do so. Trumps DOJ will make the exact opposite claim as soon as they need to.

33 Likes

Merrick Garland will make a great 9th Supreme Court Justice

57 Likes

@castor_troy @coimmigrant
So if I’m reading this correctly the President as Chief Executive can take all the monies that Congress authorizes, which they have authorized for specific agencies, he can just take all moneies and spend it on golf?

42 Likes

As long as he’s doing that under his emergency powers, the Supremes have said that’s okay.

So would just have to think up how Mar-a-GoGo needs some emergency spending.

20 Likes

Every single time the issue of a check or balance on Executive Power comes up in court, Republicans roll the tape: “Of course there are checks and balances on Executive power, your honor. Just not these ones.” Left unsaid: Republicans have already said the exact same thing about all the other ones.

The instant a Democrat is sworn in to the Presidency, Rs change out the tape: “Of course there are limits to Congress’s power to check the Executive, your honor. Just not this one.”

30 Likes

If we’re this close to getting Dolt-45 to cut a check on M4A?


“Let’s not bicker abou’ who killed who…”

10 Likes

The corrupted court will vote 5-4 that Trump is above the law.

8 Likes

This is a charade, unfortunately. Nothing will get decided until the Trump Court has its say. Intellectual honesty is the bedrock of a properly functioning judiciary, and the Federalist Society, which now owns almost half of the judiciary, essentially programs and incentivizes Republican judges to brazenly apply double standards to advance the goals of the GOP. Our judiciary has been rotting before our eyes.

34 Likes

Hey Jill Stein and Gary Johnson voters, and Berniebots who voted for Trump. Imagine if you voted for Clinton in 2016. You’d have Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court. You purity trolls and self deceiving idiots are why we are saddled with the current right wing SCOTUS majority and Trump.

Feel happy?

55 Likes