Discussion for article #237578
Gee, thanks, Bobby. I was perplexed over whether this was a good thing to do or a bad thing to do. You’ve helped me think it through. Maybe I was wrong to consider you an utterly useless panderbot shitweasel.
Fuck you Jindal. You and your gun loving ilk are part of the problem and your crocodile tears aren’t fooling anyone.
Here come the NRA sponsored politicians to explain away a major cause for gun violence in this country–the ever growing stockpile of guns and the ever decreasing regulations of them.
This is the GOP 21st century, Wild West style. Pathetic and stupid.
The media is going all out to get responses from the GOPer candidates this morning. Why? None of them will help the situation in the least.
He will be the first of many to back away from the use of terrorism to describe this act. Evil,horrific…sure. But terror will never be the first choice of any of them. Even when fed the word here, he still tries to pussyfoot around it.
But Obama denouncing the attack on Benghazi in his first public response as terrorism? No, THAT had to be misstated in a Presidential debate,and then after getting called to the mat on it by the moderator, argued that he didn’t call it an act of terror enough. Or with enough volume. Or something.
The preceding exhibition of faux outrage and indignation was wholly financed by the National Rifle Association.