I swear, the press needs to have a photo of Putin holding Donald’s hand as he forms the words that go in his speeches before they can connect the dots.
We’ve been wondering for more than two years what it would take for the trumpians to stop kissing the Pumpkin Traitors’ ass.
When you lose the RWNJ at the WSJ editorial board, you’re doomed.
This ain’t good for President Nimrod. The WSJ op-ed section is like Fox and Friends for people who can read.
He can’t go back.
But he can go down.
“Right to be there?” the board writes with indignation. “We cannot recall a more absurd misstatement of history by an American President."
Wait a few minutes. He’ll be along to best it shortly.
I screen snapped this one a month or so ago. No basis upon which to validate it, but it makes fun reading.
He doesn’t read, he doesn’t listen, he’s ignorant.
The rubes won’t read it, of course, and the GOP base is such an amalgam of reactionary ideas that most of them won’t care about international affairs anyway, but still, this helps. The old-fashioned national security crew still exist, albeit as a small minority in Republican circles these days, and it’s hard to overstate how deeply Trump put his foot in it as far as they’re concerned. The base doesn’t care until he f#%&s up an issue they care deeply about, those people included; however they’re reacting the way evangelicals would if Trump changed his campaign slogan to “abortion is awesome!”
Slammed for an “absurd misstatement of history”? Just the one?
We cannot recall a more absurd misstatement of history by an American President
I cannot recall a more absurd American President
We cannot recall a more absurd misstatement of history by an American President.
here’s one
“He’s not going to go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down and you can put it down, you can take it anywhere you want.”
“You know, the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were.”
That was a fun read and i would really love to believe it, but reminds me of stories I read months or more ago about how the justice department was about to hand down RICO indictments on the entire GOP.
it’s more than just one with Trump.
Lol, so true. It’s kind of amazing how a screw-up at 99% of someone’s threshold can be ignored completely, but when it’s just a smidge higher it’s like it’s the worst thing that ever happened. Humanity’s outrage is like a binary switch rather than a sliding scale.
Don’t make me pick a side between Trump and the WSJ - I will have a meltdown.
For those of us who do not have a WJ subscription and couldn’t bear to listen to Trump, more background information would be appreciated.
“had the most successful first two years of any president, and is the most popular Republican in party history 93%?”
There’s three more “absurd misstatement[s] of history” Toadglans tweeted just this morning.
There’s a phrase to describe this kind of behavior: Losing his mind.
Well played, Inversion. Very well played. But then, that’s what I’ve come to expect from you! 
WSJ readers care about their money. Period. They could give a shit if Trump claimed the world was flat and the moon landing was faked. Keep the tax cuts coming and the revolt will be muted.