Whatever happened to marrying the hottie and being happy?
Anonymous to you, you idiot. Not anonymous to the courts, not anonymous in 23 pages of sworn testimony. Lets see you have the courage to stand up to the abuse she took as an underage girl and that she takes now as an adult woman. Contrary to your self important opinion, you are not entitled to every bit of knowledge about a sexual assault victim.
We donāt know who Jane Doe is, but the incidence of human trafficking is high ā this is like the movie Mona Lisa on steroids. Itās totally believable, but still, I donāt see how Jane Doe No. 3 would be able to obtain damages from the USG (as opposed to, possibly, reopening the case file). Prosecutorial discretion is practically absolute, which means, it is not amenable to claims from victims because it was improperly carried out. Itās also probably worth pointing out that many women refuse to testify because they would rather settle financially, something a I sympathize with, however frustrating it is. Their lives are disrupted and they have very few means to transition to a legitimate occupation.
I think stautory rape is complelely different from sex trafficking of minors. Sounds like Epstein is a pimp. And I also wonder what he may have had over prosecutors who let him squirm off the hook like the worm he is. I notice he is keeping his mouth shut these days, isnāt he?
I donāt know, let me say, but itās most likely not what he has over them, itās more likely that primary witnesses are unwilling to testify against him. This is the really ugly side of trafficking, particularly when it involves wealthy people, the ability of wealthy people to buy off their accusers. The quid pro quo isnāt that straightforward, but these women have sure knowledge that if they testify no one will agree to give them money. They take the money and disappear. Jane Doe #3 appears to have a different view and perhaps did not accept any money.
It is not sex-related, but i have had reason to witness Epsteinās ethics in business and legal matters and it is possible to believe the worst of him. He acts like the usual rules donāt apply to him, in fact, as if the rules are a surprise to him when someone brings them up. I mean simple matters like paying your rent, doing more or less what your contract says youāll do, obeying and implementing court orders, and so on. i have no idea what he does or has done with these or any young women, but i can definitely say heās no angelā¦
āJane Doe No. 3ā Details Her Alleged Sex Acts With Dershowitz And Prince Andrew
Thatās quite the threesome.
True, but I so doubt he can get a stiffy bigger than a toothpick no matter how much medicine he takes. Makes it hard to buy the story when you consider has capacity to do the crime.
Iām really sorry you didnāt get your titillation fix from her.
I posted on this in the hive a month ago. It looks to me like this has the chance to continue growing, as there are other potential cases.
From last month:
I have several worries here. The first is certainly Clinton fatigue of the āhere we go againā type. The problem here though is that the GOP can sit back with clean hands and let the tabloid press serves this up hot everyday. Clinton doesnāt have to be the focus, but his name will come up with the other irresistible characters; Alan Dershowitz, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew.
Trump, too stupid to forego the limelight, has already offered up some choice tidbits: āIt is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.ā
Prince Andrew and the royal family have broken from the traditional quiet means of dealing with such issues and have offered repeated strong denials of underage sex. Unfortunately Andrewās visits with Epstein continued long after his release from prison - he even visited him the day Epstein was released. There are also pictures of Andrew with his hands on the teen victims bare midriff and rumors of more photos to come.
So much so that as recently as December the Duke flew to New York and stayed with Epstein for four days, attending a party that followed his release from jail. At the same time, Epstein, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose, intervened in an attempt to settle debts owed by Sarah, Duchess of York, the Dukeās ex-wife.
A photograph of the Duke strolling through Central Park with Epstein in December was damaging enough; another photo, taken in 2001 but which only emerged last week, of the Duke with his arm around the waist of a 17-year-old āmasseuseā ā who later accused Epstein of sexual exploitation ā was frankly calamitous.
Bill Clinton may not have done anything here, but there is no denying that Clinton was going to sleep overs at Epsteinās Florida mansion at a time when Epstein was having sex with minors. It also doesnāt help that the woman who is alleged to have procured the underage girls for Epstein was also a guest at Chelseaās wedding. Then there are the pictures of Clinton between two prostitutes at a party. All of this will help guarantee that this story gets plenty of airtime.
Getting caught up in a breaking story about a pedophilia sex ring canāt be a good thing for Hillaryās hopes.
Letās see the name and face of this person that CLAIMS that she was abused.
She anonymously makes the claim that named individuals committed a crime.
How does society fact check this person if she is anonymous? The courts? puhlease.
What is it about sex that makes Americans think they have to hide it?
How do you know that?
Folks, Iāll just let that comment lie there so yāall can see what weāre dealing with.
That you are lazy?