Being a Republican only protects you from the consequences of wrongdoing if your livelihood depends on Republican voters. Republican voters are willing to overlook rape and even child molestation in their representatives.
Bank CEOs are not elected by Republican voters, so his being a Republican can only help him if he decides to exit the private sector and begin looting the public sector.
Whether the bank is in violation of FDIC regs is a different question though⦠My wild guess is that it is, and that FDIC will have to come down on the bank and that will lead to a choice of either Calk is out, or the bank closes. But until that happens, my guess is that Calk is still there, until heās forced to leave.
Iām not a lawyer, but it would seem to me even if it was the bankās CEO who allegedly knew that Manafortās application was fraudulent and signed off on it anyway, what he had done was to conspire with Manafort to defraud the bankās other stakeholders, i.e., FDIC (as others have mentioned), the other shareholders, who presumably were not aware of the fraudulent application, the bankās auditors, and other federal and state regulatory agencies by intentionally and materially overstating the true value of the loanās collateral and hence the bankās true assets.
I donāt know how a successful fraud with accomplices is any less of a fraud just because one of the accomplices was a part owner.
Mr. Stephen M. Calk, also known as Steve, is the Founder, Chairman and current Chief Executive Officer of National Bancorp Holdings, Federal Savings Bank and former Chicago Bancorp. (Wikipedia)
Something tells me he will not be attending the Bankers Ball (or whatever they call it) this year.
If Manafort signed a loan application or closing document that included a material misstatement of his other debts and his current or expected income, he committed fraud irrespective of what Calk did.