Discussion for article #226339
Odd, usually it’s the anti-gay crusader who turns out to be the gay one.
His karma ran over his dogma.
He still couldn’t ‘turn’ her…what a pussy… / snark
“was dating a women”
So is this New English or something?
SNAP! That definitely left a mark!
Give it time
Can’t blame her.
Every time I see a “typo” like that I wonder if the younger generations (i.e. people under 50), the supposedly more tech savvy, understand that the squiggly line under a word is not merely a suggestion but is telling you that you have either misspelled a word, you’ve got a subject-verb disagreement or even used the wrong homophone?
Unless you are someone like Stephen Hawking, Ray Kurzweil or the Dalai Lama, spelling counts.
Well, no WONDER John’s so pissed off at the Gays.
I’ve had the younger ones tell me that the old rules no longer apply.
Susan left George Costanza for a woman too. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Look at all those smiling faces!
Yes. And this why there are so few good novelist any longer as well.
My very first reaction…the very first one…was to laugh very VERY hard.
He’s a pro-life anti-choice anti-gay Catholic. She’s a Lesbyterian.
Mixed marriages rarely work.
My first reaction was to laugh REALLY hard.
also, too
Finally!
A conservative hate-monger with skin in the game! Yeah!
She broke up with him in song