For the Party that feels government should be run like a business, they sure like to turn away a lot of customers.
âThat is textbook voter disenfranchisement,â Frost said. âI canât imagine a more clear case of disenfranchisement of the right to vote.â
Itâs what lâil Scotty does. He really is a bought-and-paid-for tool of the Kochs. Hope this bench slap leaves a mark.
Of course they do. Thatâs how theyâve always run their businesses. Deny service to whomever you like for any reason you like, and raise costs through monopoly control so that the remaining customers have no alternatives.
A business that discriminates. And skims off the top. And works with the mob. THAT kind of business.
But you better be certain your customer base will never have any other options. The business graveyard is littered with would be monopolists.
Same goes for political parties. I know it can seem hopeless at times, but people will only take so much.
And bust outs?
I heard elsewhere that one of his arguments against holding the special elections was the expense.
I guess the cost of the specials wouldâve interfered with his sweetheart deal with FOXCONN that will benefit pretty much no one.
Also the type of business that feels the surest way to success is to reduce revenues and increase costs.
They also ignored Trumpâs call to gut funding for the EPA and clean energy.
I didnât say they were good businessmen. Thatâs just how they always run them. And itâs why theyâve moved to the legislature. Itâs like welfare for failed businessmen/professionals.
Agreed. Walkerâs best defense was a string of criminally stupid arguments, making it clear that he knowingly violated the law. He figured that, worst case, WI residents would have some of their tax dollars spent defending the indefensible. Itâs not like it came out of Walkerâs pocket.
Walkerâs position on the special elections was that those writing the law was intended to insure special elections only for vacancies that occurred in a short window after the midpoint of a term. Heâs arguing that legislators were unconcerned if a winning candidate died the day after an election and a seat went unfilled for an entire term.
The talk of damages needing to exceed some âlegal requirementâ for a special election to be called is utter bullshit. The law uses a calendar to determine if a special election is mandated.
Ignoring Trump is usually the best idea.
Agreed. I was actually ideating a new criminal law last night: âelectoral cheating/malfeasance.â It would include voter impersonation, ballot-stuffing, poll intimidation, gerrymandering, intentional disenfranchisement and every other shenanigan intended to willfully undermine the democratic and constitutional rights and wishes of voters. It would specifically criminalize legislative and executive action taken with said intention in mind. It is ridiculous that someone who ineffectually votes twice is liable to imprisonment but someone who intentionally scraps an election can do so without consequence.
I so love this - former government officials using their time, intelligence, and experience to work for the betterment of their fellow citizens. (and for Holder to stick it to Walker makes me absolutely gleeful)
âIllogicalâ was a very nice word. I would have called it BULLSHIT!
Iâm not entirely proud of myself for it, but Iâm enjoying this opportunity to say, âEat shit, Walker!â
hey, itâs a win for them, less money the state will have to spend on that grubby, pathetic âpublicâ and those âservicesâ theyâre always asking for.
I get the feeling none of what is in the budget will flummox him because he just doesnât care, except for maybe no full funding of the wall. On the other hand, much of this ties the hands of his Cabinet in ways I am sure they didnât expect.
Oh my, this day is filled with such good news! Keep it coming!!! And we havenât gotten to Friday yet!