Discussion: White House: Trump 'Hasn't Changed' Position On 'Access Hollywood' Tape

“…was litigated and certainly answered during the election by the overwhelming support” for Trump and his eventual victory.”


Somebody should’ve shouted out, “… which he lost by three million votes.” The media really needs to start throwing that back in their faces every time some clown from his administration touts his big victory.

20 Likes

Arm extended below the waist, hands cupping, middle finger extended.

Sounds about right.

2 Likes

God almighty, what a worthless human Trump is. How the hell did this nation go so far off its rails that it elected this deranged narcissist? I still can’t get past it.

8 Likes

Drumpf: No change in position. That was never me in that tape which was obviously planted by Hillary and Obama.

3 Likes

“Like I just said, the President hasn’t changed his position,” she replied. “I think if anything that the President questions, it’s the media’s reporting on that accuracy.”

http://www.kxlh.com/story/33382536/donald-trump-angrily-denies-flood-of-sexual-assault-accusations?removecgbypass&clienttype=smartdevice

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/15/tucker-carlson-its-nbc-who-was-real-meddler-in-2016-election-not-russia.amp.html

From Fox

So, how did it wind up in the hands of “The Washington Post” which broke the story? How, in other words, did valuable intellectual property from one news organization end up benefitting a competitor.

Intentionally. That is the short answer.

6 Likes

“if anything that the President questions, it’s the media’s reporting on that accuracy.”

That makes even less sense than most of the drivel that comes out of her mouth.

6 Likes

Because this country is still deeply, obscenely, unfailingly racist and the election of a black man as POTUS in November 2008 was the “last straw” for about half the country, regardless of whether they admit it or are even conscious of it.

11 Likes

Was it just me or did Sarah Hucksterbee Sandworm seem to be in a difficult position groping for a remotely plausible walkback?

2 Likes

No, what she meant is that Trump still prefers to grope women in the front, rather than in the back…

1 Like

President Pussy Grabber might not have changed positions on the tape, but has he changed the placement of his hands?

1 Like

I particularly like the part where he cites the fact that Faux News can’t tell (“as far as we know”) if NBC conducted an investigation to find the “leaker.” Such a great example of the typical misdirection they feed people: Faux News WOULD NEVER KNOW about internal corporate NBC investigations. Of course they wouldn’t. So they carefully phrase it to not quite be a lie, but treat it like a fact so that “NBC never investigated it” is the (obviously intended) takeaway for the reader/viewer of average to sub-snail intelligence, which pretty much covers the intelligence spectrum for their target audience.

5 Likes

And they are all very, very upset today that Prince Harry is going to marry a black woman, but it’s not about race…

13 Likes

She’s right, his position hasn’t changed: “I get to do what I want because I’m Donald Trump and that includes raping people, being POTUS despite accusations that I raped people and using accusations against other people for personal gain when I see fit. I shouldn’t have to resign because of rape accusations, but boy howdy Al Franken sure should resign in response to accusations that he’s a butt-toucher.”

5 Likes

Are they really? I would figure that, features-wise, she looks “white enough” that they can just tell themselves “it’s just a tan”…and I have a feeling a lot of them are doing just that while Faux News tentatively tries to spark some royal-fever with a couple articles on it.

Of course, then there’s the KKKomment boards…but that’s generally the worst of the worst…

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/27/meghan-markles-engagement-ring-from-prince-harry-has-special-connection-to-princess-diana.html

2 Likes

In any case, since when are elections means of “litigating” accusations? The voters in 2016 were jurists passing judgment on the candidate’s guilt or innocence? And why if that were the case doesn’t the fact that the majority voted against him mean that he’s guilty?

But then again it’s so stupid and pointless to try to argue with the irrational. The Trumpists true victory lies in the sense of despair that now accompanies any attempt to use reason in discussing politics.

1 Like

Meanwhile, slimy James O’Keefe (Project Veritas) apparently has been outed indirectly or directly cahooting with the Moore campaign in attempting to discredit the Washington Post with one of his undercover “sting” operations.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html?pushid=5a1c860fb0a05c1d0000005d&tidr=notifi_push_breaking-news&utm_term=.496c1f9d3d62

3 Likes

She’s right, his position of insane has not changed.

2 Likes

“I never would have said it if I thought it was being recorded and, this and is important, I thought it would be used against me in any way.”

1 Like

Then there’s this…

2 Likes