Discussion for article #225190
Iâm okay with knowing what companies to avoid, too.
12 Likes
I just feel for this President. It must be beyond frustrating. I love my President
7 Likes
How do you deal with teh stoopid and nasty and still keep your dignity? sighâŚ
4 Likes
Sue! Impeach! The country wonât stand for this latest imperial indignity heaped on poor defenseless corporations.
(snark tag, for those who canât tell⌠)
2 Likes
Cue lawsuits to overturn this requirement in 5âŚ4âŚ3âŚ2âŚ
5 Likes
Obama just canât get the fact that he canât make up the laws, Congress does!
Except for when Repubs in Congress wants Obama to do stuff, like fund Syrian rebels, to go against the law in dealing with children coming across the border, insisting he can just pay the debt through slight of hand when they trigger a default, etcâŚ
10 Likes
This is the best idea achievable, and will still be considered a ghastly infringement by at least 4 Justices and everyone else who already has their reward in full.
2 Likes
Yes, SIR, Mr. President, they should. Corporationd should disclose this information for ALL TO SEE. We want to know, Iâm not sure if I want to invest in a company that decides to cover my health care needs or my family by their moral compass. Could mean big-buck loss for party/religion/alined Corporations. Donât open âPandoraâs Boxâ unless youâre ready to accept the consequences.
4 Likes
Was that satire or just stupidity?
âbe happy with what there(sic) willing to give youâ Were you born a slave or did you somehow become one?
And, yes, employers are under the obligation to provide health insurance under the law.
2 Likes
yes, employers are people and the individuals employed are people as well.
1 Like
I think that it would have been helpful for the weak of mind had you clearly labelled your post as snark since otherwise they might think you were serious.
Employers who are sole proprietors or partners in a partnership are people. Employers who are corporations are not people, regardless of what the Supreme Court or Mitt Romney (who may or may not be a people) may claim. Abraham LIncoln was very clear about the distinction between calling something something and the reality of whether that something IS a something. You ARE right that employers are under no obligation to offer any health care â if they are prepared to pay a penalty instead. Of course if an employer chooses to offer health insurance or most other benefits, they have to be offered to substantially all employees.
My screen says âSavedâ at the bottom, but neither my computer nor I are Christian.
1 Like
Under the reasoning in the other case (itâs unconstitutional to make an employer fill out a form to opt out) This would clearly be forbidden. Next step, the religious freedom to not tell employees what the insurance they pay for covers at all.
1 Like