Discussion: WH Swats Down Questions About Trump Wanting To Limit Press Access

“Honey, I’m still reeling from last night when you said you might divorce me.”
“I can’t understand why you’d be concerned. We’re married at this moment, aren’t we?”

2 Likes

It was when he learned how many decades of prison time the Cohen raid meant to him.

Only it wasn’t his eyes.

And it wasn’t his head they rolled up into.

9 Likes

Great minds indubitably. But the same goddamn thing happens over and over again for two or three years and at some point you start think the same goddamn thought in response.

4 Likes

“I’m standing up in front of you right now taking your questions,” Sanders replied, claiming that journalists have told her that “this is one of the most accessible White Houses.”

WOW! A propagator of FAKE NEWS! They are very familiar with fake news. The White House is one of the most accessible sources of fake news in the country.

5 Likes

Yes! The BEST access! (To the worst inveterate liars in America.) But GREAT access!

1 Like

Trump denying press credentials to organs he doesn’t like would indeed be a dirtbag move, but it might light a firecracker under the press and send them all out into the field to do more reporting and less stenography.

A boy can dream,can’t he?

10 Likes

In two words, they don’t!

RT is a Russian propaganda machine. Fox is a Republican propaganda machine, if not specifically a Trump White House propaganda arm.
,
And by “Infomax” I assume you mean Infowars, the product of the insane, perverted, lying mind of Alex Jones, who make propaganda out of literally everything right wing, white supremacist, and racist.

1 Like

RT is a Russian propaganda machine. Fox is a Republican propaganda machine

You say that as if they are two different things.

7 Likes

Trumpictionary:

Accurate Information: Propaganda as put out by the Trumpians to cover their tracks.

1 Like

Touché!

1 Like

I wish somebody would swat her. With the Sunday edition of The New York Times.

I don’t drink, but if I did, I sure as hell wouldn’t drink that vintage!

LOL! This should do it:

I heard this from a TV in the next room – she was at one of her more angry moments.
Of course she denies it – defends the WH – and displays utter hostility.
Understandable, considering where she works and who is her boss. There is no legitimate defense.

1 Like

OT, but WARNING, WARNING, INCOMING PRO-TRUMP LEAK PARADE:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/09/nunes-gowdy-invited-to-doj-for-classified-briefing-after-document-demands.html

Note how it’s all the major players necessary to plan out a nice barrage of helpful pro-Trump leaks and other activities and that they’ve deliberately excluded the ranking Dem members from the meeting.

4 Likes

Just call her Smokey Eye, that’s all she needs to hear. No need to bring up her weight.

1 Like

Jeebus that is disturbing.

No, I didn’t watch it. Just the title was disturbing enough.

2 Likes

Add Sinclair, Breitbart, InfoWars and Gateway Pundit and you got a deal.

I think what she meant by “accessible” is that this WH is basically open for business and selling tickets to the POTUS to the highest bidders so they can pay for a boon from their liege.

3 Likes

When he was being tutored on the Constitution, Trump was said to have rolled his eyes and pulled on his lower lip by the time the tutor got to the 4th Amendment.