It’s a perfectly mainstream proposal, in the limited sense that a complete ignoramus might find it halfway intelligent.
The guy who became his own female impersonator, Mary Rosh. I’m sure his credibility was thoroughly questioned while he was a panel witness.
speaking of misplaced animosity…
Once this commission has all of our personal information from the state voting systems they’ll be able to target registered Democrats with fake news and voter information on a grand scale. Trump lost by over 10 million votes to Hillary…without Putin and the Russians and Trump was going to lose biggly!
The Trump Dept of Justice under Sessions is a right wing white nationalist agency now. Sessions is on a mission to make Trump’s White nationalism and Nazi movement a reality in the US. Removing Democrats from the voting system will keep Trump ins power. They have a lot of work to do to make sure Trump doesn’t lose again…including shaking off Mueller’s investigation.
John Lott will have to pry the voting lever “from my cold dead hands.”
Maybe the panel can collaborate with Equifax!
John Lott is a stupid person’s idea of what a smart person sounds like.
“Lott’s track record on gun rights suggests that he is a dangerously unhinged fraud.”
FIFY.
Other than that the criteria for allowing the two different exercises of constutional rights are completely different, the records in question are known to contain both false-positive and false-negative errors, and the guy proposing this is known to have signed his name(s) to repeated false statements, what could possibly be wrong with the idea.
While we’re at it, let’s use grocery-store loyalty cards to decide who gets Social Security checks and where to send them.
I’m curious how many extra layers of verification a woman on her second marriage, who’s changed her name three times, has to go through to buy a gun.
I guess we’ll be voting at gun shows or over the internet now?
Tim Lambert had this ass-hat’s number years ago. A phony and fraud who’ll gladly use fake data to “prove” whatever point he’s trying to make.
WTF??? They won’t ALLOW background checks for guns but somehow VOTING requires it? This is like Brian Kilmead and the Confederate Statues vs 9/11 statues inanity.
“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
[quote=“paulw, post:9, topic:62086”]
Other than that the criteria for allowing the two different exercises of constutional rights are completely different, the records in question are known to contain both false-positive and false-negative errors, and the guy proposing this is known to have signed his name(s) to repeated false statements, what could possibly be wrong with the idea.
[/quote]Yet, John Lott is a guy that Kobach calls as a “witness” before the so-called Commission on Election Integrity. Even if they call voting rights advocates as witnesses, he’s thrown the entire balance toward the voting suppression crazy end of the spectrum.
I’m sorry you’re all too stupid to see how brilliant John Lott is. If I were him–which I’m not–I could probably explain it better, so that you could see how wrong and dumb you are, but anyway I’m too busy. I mean he’s too busy. But you should refer to his recent paper in the Journal of Very True and Important Facts if you want to know more.
While we’re on the subject of John Lott, have you noticed how handsome he is? I mean, mrrowr, am I right? I know it’s not the most important thing–his brilliant, correct ideas are–but as a woman, which I am, it’s hard not to feel a thrill at just the sight of his manly face.
Anyway, in conclusion, please stop trying to be so dumb. John Lott only wants what’s best for you and America, if I do say so himself.
None. I’ve been married 3 times and when I bought a shotgun a few years ago there was no problem in that regard.
How far down the rabbit hole will we go?
Why in the world was this guy testifying before this panel in the first place?
And I trust YOU with it!