Wouldnât that be considered mail fraud? Fire all the Republicans on the House postal service committee and indict them for a felony.
No surprise here because, of course, if it wasnât âhuman errorâ that led to the felonious release of her file it was conspiracy that led to it.
Now why would that matter?
If you canât trust the Post OfficeâŚ
We are continuing our review, but believe the issue began in June of 2018, and that only a small number of additional requests for information from personnel files were improperly processed
WaitâŚso there were more?? This is not anywhere close to good enough. We need a thorough investigation and heads to rollâŚin either order.
MoreâŚ
Will they at least provide her with credit monitoring since they leaked the whole thing with complete Social Security number, date of birth and full name?
Iâm sure theyâll get right on that after they close the barn door and go find the horses.
So weâre all good here, right? We apologized!
â We are continuing our review, but believe the issue began in June of 2018, and that only a small number of additional requests for information from personnel files were improperly processed.â
Hmmm, sounds like a reliable investigation is in order. Perchance were all the lapses of information about Democrats, and sent to Republican affiliated entities?
Enquiring minds want to know
This matter requires a thorough Congressional investigation.
Itâs a sad day when the USPS thinks itâs OK to lie through their teeth to the American people. Iâd be more than willing to bet all I have this was done by a wing nut that had access to the file due to position and took action. There was no error other than in thinking they could do it with impunity. But how does all that âsorry bout thatâ boilerplate undo this? The damage is done. If no price is paid it will happen again. Thereâs a wing nut FOIA officer in the USPS that needs to be on the street.
How did âhuman errorâ cause a classified document to be released publicly? Itâs not as though those files are in a place where they could easily be confused with documents that should be publicly available, are they?
Usually, when âhuman errorâ is the excuse, I think of simple clerical errors or misunderstandings. Iâm having trouble seeing how this âmistakeâ falls under that category.
Okay, I apologize b/c this is way OT; however, I see no story on this. Yesterday, Chuck Schumer made a deal with McConnell to fast track 15 - 15! - Trump judicial appointees for no apparent reason âŚ
Wow, I expected blanket denials for weeks. Somebody better get fucking fired.
Just for perspective: a reminder of how the Gore campaign handled Unintentionally receiving Bushâs debate notes.
We are continuing our review, but believe the issue began in June of 2018, and that only a small number of additional requests for information from personnel files were improperly processed.
We are continuing our review, but believe the issue began in June of 2018, and that only a small number of additional requests for information from personnel files were improperly processed. Luckily they were exclusively limited to persons running for public office on the Democrat ticket.
FIFYHold up! The Postal Service?
Since when does the Post Office process FOIA requests?
I retired from the USPS the very second I could.
The reason was Postal Management.
We had a Post Office were a least 90% did more then we had to without being ask.
Postal management destroyed this.
It was just one of those things that happen except releasing that form is a thing that actually never, ever happens.