Discussion: Unsealed Lawsuit In Broidy Case Populated With Many Familiar Faces

Whatever happened to the good old days? When a sexual escapade gone awry meant you kept quiet in a second bedroom closet while Max, home unexpectedly from work at lunch, fucked around doing God knows what in the bathroom for TWO HOURS!! Geez.

7 Likes

It’s getting so that watching (or reading) the news is each day is like the next installment on a soap opera.

Or even better: the Scandals of Crime Family Trump are now as far-fetched and overly dramatic as a telenovella.

8 Likes

Haven’t these people heard of contraception?

2 Likes

Here’s the best part of the “agreement”:

 

I don’t really want to know why she thought this was acceptable.

14 Likes

More like “Idiocracy” becoming prophetic.

5 Likes

Trump rides bareback, according to Stormy. The big issue is that here a republican politician is paying for abortion, and the GOP does not care. Abortion, like tax breaks, is for rich elites. Trump has one bastard Tiffany…born out of wedlock. maybe he has more?

6 Likes

You said it.

4 Likes

Days of Our Lies

16 Likes

Greed would be my guess. You can do a lot with $1.6M

7 Likes

As My Stomach Turns

7 Likes

I do not think this is accurate. Cite?

ETA: TT born October 1993, parents married in December according to Wiki. Divorce with Ivanna listed as 1992, no month found.

2 Likes

I suppose you’re right, but how was she sure that the agreement would actually and irrevocably net her the $1.6M?

Apparently she was gullible? Who knows… She wouldn’t be the first person to fall for a shell game like this.

4 Likes

A conspiracy philandery laundry!

Donald and Ivana Trump separated (he left her) in 1990.

The divorce was finalized in 1991 and, as with anything Trump does, it was messy.

2 Likes

And almost 30 years later we’re watching a Trump created mess play out with the great divorce of Trump and Cohen.

Remember “palimony”?

1 Like

As a member of the bar in CA, I can say that what Davidson is accused of doing in both this case and with Daniels is clearly highly unethical. Probably enough to get him disbarred. Selling out your client to those who you have conflicts with is a clear, no no.

But to answer your questions, (1) she was probably not the brightest bulb, and (2) probably had little interactions with lawyers. My guess is that she did not have many other meretricious relationships that ended with payments of $1.6M to keep a pregnancy and abortion with a top republican official secret.

8 Likes

Touché!