So. Much. Winning.
This should be tweeted:
āMAGA ā Pres. Donald J.Trumpās numbers HIGHER than Barack Hussein Obamaās! 3.2M more people now freer from govāt regulations! (No pesky healthcare insurance rules for them) Keep those numbers going in this direction, America. Winning!!ā
Chances heāll RT it?
Since he only half āreadsā stuff, Iād say the chances are damned high, Cat.
For half the cost of our āsystemāā¦
Our system sucks. Itās the worst on the planet in my opinion. Healthcare for profit is obscene. You canāt make one viable moral argument in support of it.
I wouldnāt read too much into that. His approval rating among Republicanāts (you know, the people who actually always show up to vote in non-presidential-year elections) is still greater than 80%, and his approval among Independents (you know, that group of people where many are simply too embarrassed to admit that they are Republicanāts but still religiously vote for Republicanāts anyway) is still in the mid 30s. We still have a lot of work to do defining a message centered around why people should proactively vote for Democrats rather than relying on a message of āDonald Trump SUCKS!ā That isnāt going to be good enough, as shown by the last election. Nothing short of a complete economic collapse will turn that into a winning strategy, and I really would hate to see my fellow Democrats actively rooting for Americans to lose their jobs, homes, healthcare and lives just because weāre too lazy/stupid/cynical/tribal/no-better-than-Republicanāts/owned-by-plutocrats to actually craft and run a truly people-oriented campaignā¦
3.2 million new uninsured means that 3000 more people will die in the US this year.
Thatās okay.
Trumpās base will pay their expenses. After all, why pay for it when Trump will make it free?
āOver the course of President Donald Trumpās first year in office, the number of Americans without health insurance increased 1.3 percentā¦ā
And thatās just the beginning. Paul Ryan must be so pleased.
Making America Great Again???
Well, they are cutting the budgets of the CDC and NIH. so, yeah.
Itās likely that a large share of these folks were Drumpf voters. I wonder if the cause/effect relationship will sink in?