Alright, enough already with the āwithout evidenceā stuff. Why donāt we agree that we will save the reference to evidence to situations like the following:
āTrump, this time with evidence, says it was raining at the White House this morning.ā
That will save a lot of trees because the number of references will be rather few.
Emperor has no credibility.
Isnāt this an impeachable offense? I mean reallyā¦if it isnāt it should be.
āItās such an important story for our country and the world. It is one of the big stories of our time.ā
<img src="/uploads/default/original/3X/3/0/3061be69c3ae7fc0bcced8b3d02e2e04bf7318fd.png" width="259" height="194">
Thereās nothing worse than a reckless megalomaniac with power.
He redefines āunfitā every dayā¦
I still have to go with cilantro.
flail
flÄl
Verb
gerund or present participle: flailing
1.Trump* waved or swings or causes to wave or swing wildly.
āTrumpās* arms were flailing helplesslyā
synonyms: wave, swing, thrash about, flap about
āTrump* fell headlong, his arms flailingā
Without Evidence
Iām so fuckinā tired of this āwithout evidenceā business.
This is disgusting, can she sue him ?
Except one whoās a kleptocrat who has been bought and paid for by Russia.
@theghostofeustacetilley Iām grateful he left his clothes on.
She of course would win. And unlike Obamaās caseā¦ it actually may not be a bad ideaā¦
My cat is no less presidential than this knucklehead. Heās also careful to crap only in his litter box, and privately.
YUGE hole in his reasoning. How did she know who she was āunmaskingā until the names were āunmaskedā?
The quotation marks above are really the point. āUnmaskingā sounds nefarious and the Rs can rally around it.
This is why the Ds have to hit back with insistence that there be an investigation of Trumpās āmoney launderingā for Russians. Thatās definitely a crime, and thereās already strong evidence of it. (See: Sale of Florida Trump property for $100M when worth on market only $50M at most.)
Iād be happy to see Susan Rice on the witness stand, then Donald Trumpā¦under oath with Schiff asking the questions.
āDo I think? Yes, I think,ā
Low hanging fruit
Yes. Pure, unmitigated vicious slander with active malice.
And she should hire one of the many firms in DC with lawyers with high security clearances and sue the living shit out of him. Discovery ought to be fascinating.
He thinks Susan Rice committed a crime, and I think he should be committed.