no
Then Iād have to say they would not have negative effect. Think of his base, right?
She became a Trump fan when he tweeted her name.
Did anyone notice that Flowers makes enough money from her infamy to have an assistant?
that tooā¦but while Iām not sure about '12, in '16 Fiorina was almost an Olympian like sprinter in regards to that Planned Parenthood issue.
blame Trump
i want to hear her say itā¦
Earlier in September, Cuban offered to donate $10 million to a charity of Trumpās choiceāor to Trump himselfā
arenāt these, by definition, the same thing?
ok, I have to admit, fair is fair. HRC invited Mr. Cuban to be her guest at the debate, for the simple reason that heās been ragging on Mr. Trump incessantly throughout the campaign, and not just since the conventions. Mr. Trump inviting Ms. Flowers is kind of quid pro quo, so I honestly donāt have a problem with it per se. of course, being Trump, he had to go low class. he could have invited any number of people who would have been taken seriously, but since this is just another ārealityā show to Mr. Trump, heās turned it into an episode of The Jerry Springer Show.
stay classy Mr. Trump.
no
there will be some who will try to see the bright side to all of that. me? Iāll just see Trump as a cuckolded birther.
But you liked the video.
Carly? no
Iāll just see Trump as a cuckolded birther.
well, Sheriff Joe Arpeio says heās still āinvestigatingā the issue, so Mr. Trump at least has a boyfriend going for him.
Trump is Britting Shicks right now at the thought of debating Clinton. None of his juvenile stunts will bother her and he knows it.
Remember Rick Lazio. The LADY will eat the orange man for breakfast.
I suspect because it hasnāt yet quite reached firm enough ground of credibility. Note that Josh hasnāt tackled this one either, and he surely is well aware of it. ATM itās just increasingly visible yellow journalism that may or may not have adequate/actionable grounding in evidence. How long did it take for the charges against Cosby to gain the mainstream? It could be years, though I suspect not if the legally verifiable evidence is actually there. Even then it took a while before the jury of public opinion gave up its Cosby-worship and went for the throat. And it may never get beyond the mixed-credibility situation of the allegations against Woody Allen, in which case it wouldnāt clear the bar for action against Trump.
Note that there is, as usual, a double standard for crediting such charges against Trump vs anything against Hillary; the slightest paranoid accusation against her is immediately credited and given full voice; not so in the other direction. Nor does Hillary or her campaign stoop to Trumpās level in using such stuff.
I will say that I find the charges eminently believable, given his public behavior over the years.
No. That one was about demon sheep or something. I meant the Mrs. Trump video you seem so well acquainted with.
āDonāt go for the knockout punch,ā he told The News. āRather, amplify the negatives she already has ⦠distinguish yourself as the change agent and Hillary as more of the failed and uninspiring status quo.ā
now if that was directed towards a normal candidate, then maybe a point swing would occur. However there isnāt anything that would suggest Trump as a āchange agentā.
ā¦
it doesnāt exist.
Well, that doesnāt help anybody.
which part?
The Cosby allegations have always been out there, even before the Andrea Costand agreement came about. Basically everything came to the forefront, because of Cosbyās āmoralityā was a part of that Hannibal Burress routine going viral
Has anyone considered the possibility that maybe Mark Cuban is actually not going to be at the debate and that this is just some fake-out on the part of the Clinton campaign?
When this system was new there were a lot of duplicate posts (and lost ones that never came through). Going to your post to verify that is was entered is the only reason I can think of that this setting isnāt the default.