The next time Drumpf tells the truth it will be breaking news.
There is no bigger threat to national security than this hideous, prevaricating, reckless sack of slime.
This guy would be in jail if any other person and rightly so…For now I would settle for someone slapping him into the middle of next year. Cowardly little bullyboy losing to a girl and threatening her with his lies!
By the time he loses – and loses badly – this sack of shit will be in a straitjacket.
Hannity insisted, after reminding the audience again that he was “pulling the lever for Donald Trump in this election.”
I think Hannity is pulling Donald Trump’s lever, and on a regular basis.
Yes, the older gentleman behind you who looked dumbstruck when you made the Second Amendment line knew you were talking about voting.
Sorry, but this is bullshit. Drumpf’s tag line about how this will be “a horrible day” does not jibe logically with political action. You know it. I know it. And Hannity, you mealy-mouthed shit-weasel, you know it, too. And, of course Drumpf lapses into gibberish about power and me, ME, ME!
There can be no other interpretation.
The short-fingered vulgarian doth protest too much, methinks
“There can be no other interpretation,”
…says the authoritarian in charge of deciding what words mean.
Rep. Ryan interpreted the comments as “a joke gone bad.”
How can such a despicable human being be a candidate for the Presidency of the USA? If it was Pokeystan I’d understand. Mike Pence must have a regular case of running stomach. " Why am in this race with this jackass"?? Too clever by half!!!
Trump? Walking it back? The day after?
What was said? Was intended.
I hate this guy for foisting himself on he world–
–because he couldn’t take a joke.
jw1
From a Chris Hayes retweet:
No, Donzy, there “can be no other interpretation.” Your psychotic 2A acolytes heard you perfectly.
In the scenario that Trump laid out Clinton has already been elected and the “second amendment people” would be the only ones with a chance of stopping her from appointing judges. So if the election is over and Clinton is in office, how are these “second amendment people’s” votes going to stop her from appointing Supreme Court justices?
Here’s Trump’s “joke”:
- Clinton wants to take your guns away;
- If she is elected, she will appoint Supreme Court Justices who will vote to let her take your guns away;
- Once that happens, there will be nothing we can do to stop her;
- Except maybe using the second amendment solution.
The structure of the “joke” very clearly has the use of the “second amendment solution” after SCOTUS has authorized the taking of guns, and not before.
That means he was joking about assassinating a sitting president of the United States over policy decisions.
That means he is advocating treason.
At the very least on the No-Fly list.
Every single time he says or does something despicable, he reacts by insisting on some completely implausible alternative reading unjustified by the words he used or any other facts. Over and over again. It’s exactly like the “Dead Parrot Sketch” if the sketch went on for a year, you changed the pet shop owner to a moron Presidential candidate, and it was one of the least funny things you’d ever experienced.
Morning Joe says the GOP has to dump Trump now:
So does the NY Daily News.
Hmmmmm-huh. Unified voters is the only way you could interpret 2nd Amenders dealing with the “Clinton Problem”. The GOP are probably kicking themselves, saying “NOW, he learns to dog-whistle ?!?!?!”