Discussion: Trump Reacts To Supreme Court Upholding His Travel Ban: 'Wow!'

Susan Sarandon is surely pleased.

6 Likes

This just proves that in addition to taking over the House, Senate and Presidency, the democrats need to get rid of a couple of radical justices too… I would vote for Thomas and Gorsuch.

6 Likes

This will surely just hasten that Glorious Revolution!
After the slamming that Susan Serendipity took on Twitter a few days back when she Tweeted about the immigrant children, I don’t think your going to hear any comment from her on social media about this subject any time soon.

2 Likes

2018 midterms have taken on a new urgency today. We have got to break their stranglehold on this government.

6 Likes

Remember how much you love the federal judiciary when you and your crime family are indicted, tried, and convicted, asshole.

4 Likes

Damn right

2 Likes

Response of an illegitimate president to the ruling of an illegitimate Supreme Court.

4 Likes

How do you propose doing that? We can vote to get a Democratic congress so the next SC vacancy is filled with a reasonable judge - but it is virtually impossible to remove a sitting justice.

3 Likes

He’ll pardon his family and himself and the court will uphold it 5-4.

6 Likes

Have any in history been impeached ?

Did that just leave the door open on clawing back Execuitve Authority? By this Congress?

1 Like

Three mulligans later, Two-scoops hits it into the fairway, or at least what the reactionary rat-bastards on SCotUS thought was the fairway.

It looked to me like a lot of rock and bare ground.

Thanks Comey…

2 Likes

Impeachment is the only other way… only 1 in history I believe

1 Like

3 Likes

And everyone else being investigated by the Mueller probe - everyone!
He’ll be drunk with power knowing that the SCOTUS has him covered.

2 Likes

I think one could make a case for impeaching Clarence Thomas on the grounds that he perjured himself in the confirmation hearings. But I equally think that would be a very dangerous road to follow.

Yep. But the court will say it’s not precedent a la Bush v Gore.

Basically in SC speak means “IOKIYAR”

I think the money his wife receives is clearly payola for favorable (to “conservatives”, AKA Radicals) rulings.

This is the only Avenue to take for Thomas.

Gorsuch is the fruit if the poisoned tree and should be impeached on that (won’t happen as Senate confirmed and the “legitimacy” is intact by virtue of that, at least as we are talking about a Republican appointee, if Dem maybe a different story)

1 Like