Why do they hate Amurica!
Itâs like trying to âwalk backâ eating a small child alive.
Thatâs just not how this works, Tom.
The man is no politicianâhe spoke his mind.
âSo for us to dictate what we think is the moral code there, when we have a young man and regime that is trying to push themselves in to 2030, I think is a mistake.â
Hm. The âyoung manâ defense ⌠Itâs not just for white people anymore.
Um⌠The clarification is almost as confusing as the original statement.
He seems to be suggesting that âRule of Lawâ is different in autocraccies - and thus - we donât understand/shouldnât dictate/judge - things like a brutal assassination (er - kidnapping and assassination) by a government because⌠ârule of lawâ.
Dude, itâs just going to get darker and darker for you. The scrutiny is getting sharper on you and your role and the whole Inaguration fundraising and spending. That is getting pretty bad. Stepping out now and going high profile - and appologia/coverage for KSA and thus for Trumpâs position (and law breaking per the report required by Congress) - seems a bit foolhardy. And perhaps a tad sinister.
to TPM: âconfidanteâ - spelled w. an âeâ is the feminine form. Barrack is male, therefore, âconfidantâ w/o an âeâ is the correct word. Please note for future usage.
And indicator of the good guysâ (us) position, which is stronger than Barrack (or his handlers) originally thought
when we have a young man and regime that is trying to push themselves in to 2030,
OMG. What bullshit. Looks like they have to be dragged into it screaming.
Lame apology.
Yup, he showed his white supremacist authoritarian side. And folks wonder why he would be Trumpâs âonly real friendâ birds of a feather and allâŚ
canât unring that bell TommyâŚ
Walking it back because he was caught saying it in the first place. Youâre a pig, Tom. Simple as that.
I suppose he could have been picked as SoS. He would be perfect in a Trump administration.
Whatâs left of it.
â
The killingMy undisguised glee over the savage murder and unimaginable bone-sawing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi was atrocious and inexcusable,â Barrack wrote in a statement. âI apologize fornot making this clear in my commentsgetting caught celebrating in public earlier this week.â
Fixed.
He got his (and Trumpâs) true point across to his rich foreign friends. They understand that his craven apology in the USA is a meaningless necessity of domestic politics.
Is there any one in this administration who cares about the law? Anyone?
Only in the sense that they want to get away with breaking it.
Obviously Barrack should step down from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.