Trump continued, “No moderators needed. Hillary can provide calm, logical, reasoned answers, and I can just throw feces at her. What’s not to like? It would be a ratings bonanza. And the Press would cover both sides equally, so I would win.”
No moderator, just an automatic device that gives you a shock every time you speak too long, interrupt your opponent, or say something that’s rated “pants on fire”. Works for me.
“…everybody said I won the so called forum…”
Gee, I guess I’m the only one who didn’t ?
Pre-whining in advance of the debates. Followed by whining during the debates, then whining after the debates. I’m noticing a trend here…
No, Donnie. The most obvious solution would be if you would act like a reasonable adult who doesn’t throw a tantrum when he doesn’t get everything he wants.
Translation: He’s worried he’s going to get creamed in the debates and therefore is attempting to both manage expectations, and “work the refs.”
Cage match? No problem, Donnie.
HRC would kick your fat ass, even with pneumonia.
Finally! But good choice for the return…
Shecky Drumpf never disappoints…
One observation I’d care to make:
BUCK-BUCK-BUCK-BUCK-BUCK-AW
Of course with the increased pressure for moderator to call out lies he doesnt want them there.
Wait for Matt Lauer to start whining about why Donnie didn’t propose this for the CIC debacle. 3, 2, 1
I really wonder if he will skip out at the very last minute and claim they are all against him. Hey, he might make a strategic decision to do just that, given the dufus’s he employs as unpaid staff and his penchant for ignoring good advice.
Wow, imagine the blowback if he does…I love it!
Putin said nice things about me. But I am afraid of Lester, Anderson and Martha
Did he say this today (Monday) or last Tuesday? I’m guessing today.
Trump alleges that everyone says he won the debate, but a Google search of “Trump Won Commander-in-Chief Debate” doesn’t come up with anyone saying that in the first three pages of results except an instant online poll tweeted out by Trump.
BTW, neither does a search of “Clinton won Commander-in-Chief Debate” back her winning.
Same for either candidate “won Lauer debate”.
Most of the links are that Lauer was awful, and few picked a winner.
What’s that old saying? When you’re defending Matt Lauer, you’re losing.
Don’t confuse us with facts.
If he’s within 1 or 2 points of Clinton in enough battleground states he’ll skip citing that the press is all against him, the debates are rigged, and the moderators cant be impartial.
After this last weekend, I expect them to be tied for Electoral Votes within two weeks.