Shorter GOP: Don"t be surprised if the election results donât match the polls.
Going to look really funny if that is more frequently the caee where ballots can be audited than where they canât.
âThe country is too complex now just to call a couple hundred people and ask them what they think,â Parscale told CBS Newsâ Major Garrett. âThe way turnout now works â the abilities that we have to turnout voters â the polling canât understand that.â
Is this going to be a repeat of 2012?
The 2016 polling, he said, âwas 100% wrong.â
No they were accurate except they didnât factor in a Treason With Russians fudge factor.
That happened in Mexico a lot up to the 90s, the official candidates were usually trailing in the polls and always won with 60+ % of the vote, until opposition parties got bored and didnât even bother to field candidates.
âYou may end up with a different math, but youâre entitled to your math, Iâm entitled to THE math.â
Last night just as the moron in chief was unpacking the clown car in Orlando and the crowd had only begun shouting âLock her up!â, the Orlando Sentinel which typically endorses repub nominees (with the exception of rMoney if Iâm not mistaken) published this non endorsement, donât even think about it, you looney POS
After 2½ years weâve seen enough. Enough of the chaos, the division, the schoolyard insults, the self-aggrandizement, the corruption, and especially the lies.
So many lies â from white lies to whoppers â told out of ignorance, laziness, recklessness, expediency or opportunity.
Trumpâs capacity for lying isnât the surprise here, though the frequency is.
Itâs the tolerance so many Americans have for it.
@mattinpa The Sentinelâs timing was impeccable. trumPP went to bed, if he ever does, thinking about it. So, come the light of day, psychotic paranoid lash out!
So make sure thereâs no audit-able paper trail of the votes.
Itâs not complicatedâŚTrumpâs currently behind.
Americaâs too complex for Trump, is how things really are, and itâs his ability to turn off voters, not turn them out, thatâs going to be meaningful here. P.S. Gonna be a long 16 months, so pro tip: pay no attention to the noises coming out of this Parscale moronâs mouth and trying to find their way through his beard to the light of day. Waste of time.
The Trump campaign did not respond to TPMâs request for comment, but experts said they smelled puffery.
Once again, tRump campaign telegraphs their intentions.
Well, America, are you going to intercept the pass this time for a breakaway slam?
They will use every trick humanly possible. If Trump is not behind bars and/or has resigned, I believe that he will look at the âelectionâ as a coronation
This is the occasion in which I wish that every American has spent at least six years in a dictatorship to understand what Trump is planning for us.
It was never that I did not trust Pelosi. What I am looking for is for Hearings of the sort resulting in Trump to be laid bare such that the even the GOP will lose Senate seats if they remain with Trump and he is so catastrophically weakened that the âelectionâ , if his name in on the Ballot, would be a civic formality for the formality of the Republic.
If he evades exposure (and, therefore, Justice) and remains more or less in the BothSiderist U.S. political culture, I believe he will win.
Do. Not. Mention. trumppâs. Behind. Itâs gross. Add in the triple combover coming apart and itâs extra gross.
[quote=âajm, post:2, topic:89095â]
Shorter GOP: Don"t be surprised if the election results donât match the polls.
[/quote]Yep - trying to condition the people and the media so a big disparity in polling and vote totals is shrugged off, or just met with some concern and meek acceptance.
Hey, Democrats! We need a little more outrage over here, and the ability to sustain it for 17 months to the election and the ensuing 2 or 3 or 6 months when Trump and the complicit Republicans are fighting the results if it doesnât go their way.
Or they could be getting people softened up for polls that say Trump loses in a big way and Trump âwinsâ in a big way instead.
I donât know why everybodyâs so anxious to see some grand, deep strategery here. The polls are shit, Parscale isnât half as smart as he thinks he is, and he has to give some sort of response.
If their polls were good, they would be saying âlook at our good polls!â. Theyâre not. This cigar is more likely just a cigar.
Jeez. A ray of sanity breaking through what is frankly paranoia on a grand scale. The thrust of the article is polls and the maladministration portraying them now and going forward as unreliable, unbelievable, etc. Some of the communications were through tweets, but did no one read this:
But, Kondik [Kyle Kondik, managing editor of the University of Virginia-based polling newsletter Sabatoâs Crystal Ball] predicted. thereâs no landslide in Trumpâs future, as Parscale forecast to CBS.
âEven if you assume that the polls are understating Trumpâs support at a level commensurate with 2016,â he said, âeven if you give Trump the benefit of the doubt in these polls, itâs still reflective of a competitive general election.â
I"m not usually like this but I donât think Trump âwonâ in 2016. I also question Cruzâs âwinâ since in early voting machines were switching Beto votes to Cruz.
I think Iâm a bit justified.
When Trump was ask about the polls, he wanted to know what Poland had to do with the election?