Pardons have not been discussed, and pardons are not on the table
Trump says differently
I think Trump’s tweet regarding pardons was more a signal to anyone who might be thinking of testifying against him.
The President’s lawyer might well argue that they have had and continue to have not-conversations about pardons because there’s—drumroll please—ta da! Nothing to pardon! Everything’s ju-ust fi-ine in legal jeopardy terms. No problemo. We cool. But I wonder.
Would make sense if written in non Twitter style: “…@jaketapper “somebody” called him yesterday, doubting…”
Maybe yesterday?
@antisachetdethe beat me
Does this clown even have a JD? It seems like all he does is go on television to distract people for a few hours with his stupidity.
My guess is “yest” was just an abbreviation for “yesterday”…
ETA: Looks like a lot of us all responded at the same time. Smart people here at TPM.
Grassley is missing from this image, although he only belongs on there most days, not all.
A degree from Walter George Law at Mercer. Ranked 105 out 0f 145 law schools in the nation
ETA: Other notable graduates: Nancy Grace and Erik Erickson
Sekulow forgot the “…yet” at the end of his statement.
If Sekulow was actually smart enough to be a WH-level lawyer, he’d know to STFU with claims that, if overturned, might make him an accessory.
Thankfully, nobody in Team Treason is actually that smart.
“The truth is, these aren’t very bright guys. .And things got out of hand.”
A rich banker from the much denounced by Trump in the campaign Goldman Sachs!
So he isn’t going to get a pardon for his charity fraud? Question is which drumper am i referring to when i say he? So many to choose from.
Unremarkable? Unbelievable
Scaramucci tells Tapper an expert told him that Russia didn’t hack the election because if they did, there would be no evidence because they’re that good. Who? When pressed, expert is the President.
“rather unremarkable.”
Lawyer-speak for “remarkably stupid.”
Classic Sucksatlaw: What pardons?