And the right will not care about the appearance of waffling at all.
P.S.: Why do I have to go to an empty comments section first, and then find a little red discussion word up in right corner and click on that, in order to find the actual comments?
And why if I reply in the Option One area my comment is displayed in one continuous apparently endless line, and if I reply here, my comment is displayed over to the right in identical but a different typeface form?
And why have I asked the same questions addressing the same inexplicable unfeatures of the new comment system over and over with no reply ever?
wah wah wah⌠the right is turning itself into a bunch of crybabies.
âŚall this âtheyâ take from âusâ BS belies an ever-deepening selfishness on the part of many Americans, inspired by FOX and Bleck and The Lump, in their daily drive-time propagandaâŚafter decades of mindbending, just the thought that one would have to give aid and comfort to any other person is only slightly less appealing to them than their standard excuse that it might be spent on drugs.
How would any alternative policy account for the millions of previously uninsured people who have gotten health coverage under Obamacare?
This is a question that is okay when addressing policy geeks, but a terrible one for focusing on the strengths of the legislation and communicating its benefits to people. As Dylan himself notes, focusing on the net reduction in uninsured people immediately ties you up in arguments about the âcorrectâ number. It also makes it easy to (falsely) paint ACA as a program that makes all of us pay more for our insurance to give free insurance to those who didnât have it before, didnât seem to be dropping dead, and have done nothing to earn it.
I believe that the focus should be on the sense of security brought by knowing that; you can get health coverage even if your job is one of the [insert the approximate large number of millions here] million jobs that donât provide health insurance benefits; if you learn that you or a family member has developed cancer or some other condition that is costly to treat, you wonât be dropped by your insurance company as soon as your 6- or 12-month policy ends; you can strike out on your own and establish a new business without the handicap of paying sky-high non-group rates for insurance or the risk of underinsuring your family; your policy very likely will have coverage for whatever healthcare you require; your insurance company will not be allowed to comb through your insurance application from 10 years ago to find an excuse to deny payment for treatment today; etc.
How would you create a cheaper coverage bracket, while also keeping deductibles/out of pocket maximums at a somewhat manageable level? SINGLE PAYER, aka uruhpeen soshulism.
The ACA could be a revolution in how health care is delivered. We should have more accountability when it comes to unnecessary and overpriced procedures. Doctors get rich on ignorance, which is what the opposition party is peddling.
I think she made a terrific point by not using UN. Iâve moved on to the 13th step and trying to arrange a meeting with her in the Capitol Rotunda. lol
"
Republican lawmakers around the country are adding criminal background checks or licensing requirements for workers hired to help people enroll in health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, taking aim at perceived security risks involving customersâ personal information.
More than a dozen GOP-controlled states have passed legislation tightening requirements for the enrollment counselors, and bills in other states are pending. While the federal government does not require criminal background checks for navigators, states can set their own rules.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer last month signed a bill requiring licensing and background checks for navigators who help people buy health insurance on the federal marketplace. Republican proponents said the requirements will help protect consumers from identity theft. Louisianaâs legislature unanimously approved a similar measure with a Senate vote Tuesday.
Still, thereâs no sign that enrollment guides, even those with criminal records, have misused consumersâ personal information in any state.â
You were subtle about it, but what you really mean is profit control, because that is why there are so many unnecessary and overpriced procedures in the first place. But, when you put thew words âpriceâ or âprofit,â and âcontrolâ on the same line, they get very nervous.
What happened to the âdeath panelsâ you promised were lurking in the law?
Why hasnât the economy tanked the way you said it would if Obamacare went into effect?
Why do most people oppose repeal when you assured us that âAmericans hate Obamacareâ?
The several dozen other questions can wait til youâve answered these.
Several more questions will likely arise in response to todayâs reporting that health insurers are eager to âexpand their offerings to more states.â âInsurers continue to see this a good business opportunity.â Eight million have signed up for coverage in 2014, next yearâs enrollment will be around 13. million. How can the Rs deny this opportunity to an industry which has always (wink, wink) supported them
The republicans loved universal healthcare when Mittens offered it in MA and touted itâs success because it was done by a republican. When Obama brought up the ACA, the republicans were totally against it even though one of the people who helped guide itâs shape was one of the people who did it for MA. The republicans hated it because it was done by a democratic president and not a republican. Itâs the perfect picture of a 2-faced bunch of political SOBâs.
Pretty basic questions, but youâll never hear any of the Sunday morning talk shows actually ask them. That would be âgotcha journalismâ and the GOP would refuse to make any further appearances on whichever show hurt their feelings like that.
Itâs amazing to the majority of us typically rate things on the basis of our actual experience but that fools like you rate things based on the propaganda you eat every day from Drudge, Fox and your other non-information sources.
The law has been implemented what seven (7) months now? And as more people see the benefits of it the approval rates slowly but surely rise.
Of course for those states that refused to help out the weakest of their citizenry Iâd guess that the propaganda might continue to out weigh actual experience and most citizens in those states will continue to know only what theyâve been told rather than what theyâve actually experienced.
So it goes with you sheeple.who are unwilling to learn from actual experience and instead choose to be what ever youâre told by Faux Snooze.
Would âbad life choicesâ include getting cancer? Because people have lost their health insurance after getting treated for cancer. And FYI Google âAndy Kaufmanâ and check out his âlife choicesâ before he got the cancer that killed him.
