Discussion for article #232969
Huh.
Imagine that.
First he got shot at.
Then he did.
Then he didnât
Jesus, this is like watching a weather vane in a tornado.
Want some cinnamon and sugar to put on that âtoastâ, Brian and NBC News?
I really hate that smarmy fucker, and always did. But what I find truly funny is how FoxNews and the rest of their RW fucknut acolytes are going after Williams like he is a liberal firebrand when he has constantly shown himself to have his head firmly up their assholes, just like that other left-wing paragon, Matt Lauer.
I guess right-wingers must be pretty tasty, considering how often they devour their own. Pass the blue cheese dipping sauce, wonât you please, Mr. Ailes?
Surely there is a log that documented what happened. I mean come on. Someone should ask the military to confirm or not confirm what happened. Look if Brian lied he lied, but if there is some truth to his story than there should be confirmation written down. I know that when I worked in civil service for the AF everything was documented. Why hasnât real journalist asked for that report.
You know, reading this article and Mr. Krellâs statement about wishing to not remember those years in Iraq and Afghanistan brought back those strong feelings I had back then thinking how awful it is going to be for those soldiers who went over there to fight a war we chose to instigate and the horrendous things these folks are going to be subjected to will haunt so many Americans for many decades to come. I really wish Bush, Cheney and Company could/would be forced to face the music for leading the world down that rat hole. The American response to the atrocities of 9/11 was so very misguided ⌠and deliberately so.
Itâs telling that no confirmation of his story has been put forth.
Does anyone suppose NBC will can him?
I think theyâll hunker down and hope it blows over before making a decision.
Thereâs a mighty slim chance of that.
I also said that a written report was done and should tell the story. If he lied he should resign, but if there is truth to some of his story than that changes the picture. There may well be no confirmation of his story in the report, but the report should come out either way.
It really isnât, sad to say. If heâs full of crap, the military isnât going to call a high-profile news anchor on it - theyâve spent forty years working to make sure the media turning on them the way they did in Vietnam never happens again. If heâs telling the truth, the military isnât going to defend a journalist over the words of even one or two of their own - theyâre not going to send that message to the currently-commissioned officers in the service, âwe value the talking heads more than youâ. It might be true, but theyâre never going to tell that to officers. Enlisted personnel, maybe, but even Warrant Officers get more protection from the rest of the Officersâ Mess than that.
So, no: while the story is happily tearing itself apart on the air without actually involving them at all, thereâs no reason whatsoever for the Pentagon to step in. The only thing that could do would be to move the spotlight from Williams to them, and they donât want any part of having reporters asking them about anything that happened during the Iraq War. And there isnât going to be any word from lower commands, because letâs face it, nobody in a position to know has any clue what kind of shitstorm theyâd be opening themselves up to from the guys above them.
âShit rolls downhillâ might be a trusim in all walks of life, but I promise you, in the service it reaches heights I havenât seen since I left NAS Norfolk. And that was just as a Navy brat.
Couldnât a FOIA be done?
Itâs hilarious how some people are trying to turn this into a partisan issue. Itâs not, and neither party owns the moral high ground.
Hillary Clinton made similar false claims about being under sniper fire in Bosnia when she was First Lady in 1996. And Ronald Reagan repeatedly told a story about a heroic pilot in World War II, which was actually a scene from the movie âA Wing and a Prayer.â
Like Wile E. Coyote, how long can Brian hang in the air?
I actually feel empathy for Brian Williams. The fog of war is real and the fallibility of human memory is very real, especially when fear and adrenaline and chaotic events are involved. I was in a car accident with my parents and when it was over, the right side of my fatherâs leg was bleeding and the left side of the car was smashed. However, all of us perceived that the right side of the car had been hit and no one could figure out how my father had injured his leg. I actually think it could be a perfectly honest mistake. He could really have conflated the story in his mind And, yes, as a journalist he should double check his facts but most people donât double check their own memories.
This is a big non-story to me. Combat, even when not being fired at, is a whirlwind of adrenaline, emotions and experiences and I donât expect non-military personnel to recall everything perfectly. Apparently military personnel donât recall everything perfectly either. I chalk this up to an individual (makes no difference that heâs a news/media figure) embellishing or mis-remembering a rather small detail of what actually happened many years ago. Since he is in the news/media, itâs up to his peers to decide if he should be held to a different standard but I donât see it as a big enough âflubâ to be fired over.
To them heâs a âliberalâ. Remember these people think Obama is a Kenyan muslim Socialist". Anyone who is not a crazed foaming at the mouth Obama hater, or anti immigrant, or anti gay automatically becomes a liberal.
Rasho-anchor-mon.
The thing is that it takes a lot of balls to go into these war zones and do reporting, itâs admirable work. Why the hell do you need to lie to make it sound better? Makes no sense.
Heâs full of crap. But so what? He was lying about a personal anecdote, years later. Did he get the story he was reporting on at the time wrong?
Now, if he had a history of getting major facts wrong in a real news piece, or say, being a stenographer to the PTB, or had an agenda to lie to support a RW agenda (ahem, FOX!), or say consistently fluffed up a governor and doesnât report on any of the newsworthy scandals in order to maintain access to said governor (ahem, Wisconsin media) then that would be a problem. But those hacks are never fired, are they?
Why should the messenger be newsworthy? Why should we care about this guy? Heâs an overpaid news reader now anyway.