other than MADDOW and -DIAZ-BALARTā¦the others are all wimpy thumb-suckersā¦SAVANNAH GUTHERIE/CHUCKIE TODD??? GEEZ!
Letās get this show on the road.
Two fronts of action - debate coverage - and investigations.
What an amazing cast of partisan corporate hacks for moderators! 
Savannah Guthrie and Chuck Toddā¦ew.
Weāre going to end up debating how stupid these questions were rather than how the candidates performed or the substance of their answers.
Same as it ever was. The whole notion of a ādebateā with more than 10 people is absurd anyways.
Cillizza wasnāt available?
Yeah, Rachel Maddow!!!
Weāre never going to get better as a country if we keep dragging ChuckfuckingTodd along with us.
Bring on the āWhen did you stop beating your spouse?ā questions! A fine collection of hacks, Republicanāts and brown-nosers of imperial power. And Rachel Maddowā¦
And the fun of watching Fat Nixon complain that they are hogging the news cycle
Time for a new tariff or bombing or something
Thank You
debate noun
deĀ·ābate | \ di-ĖbÄt
, dÄ-
Definition of debate
(Entry 1 of 2)
: a contention by words or arguments Our polite chat about politics became a heated debate. The case sparked a raging public debate on property rights. : such as
a law, government : the formal discussion of a motion (see motion entry 1 sense 3a) before a deliberative body according to the rules of parliamentary procedure
b : a regulated discussion of a proposition (see proposition entry 1 sense 1b) between two matched sides the last presidential debate before the election the debateās moderator
debate verb
debated; debating
Definition of debate (Entry 2 of 2)
intransitive verb
1 obsolete : fight, contend
2a : to contend in words
b : to discuss a question by considering opposed arguments
3 : to participate in a debate the six primary candidates who debated last night
transitive verb
1a : to argue about the subject was hotly debated
b : to engage (an opponent) in debate a governor debating her challenger
2 : to turn over in oneās mind : to think about (something, such as different options) in order to decide still debating what to do
Excuse Me
Itās Chuck āItās Not My Job To Inform Peopleā fucking Todd
Aināt that the truth! Honestly, other than Todd, Iām good with the moderators. Iām glad Maddow will be in the mix to hopefully steer the discussion to Democratic base issues and Holt and Diaz-Balart have done well with this kind of thing in the past.
Thatās going to be a whole new aspect to 2020. Heās chewed up just about every news cycle since 2015. Heās going to increasingly find himself being forced to share the limelight which will only upset him even more especially because theyāll be saying terrible things about him. I fear heāll just direct Barr to launch a new investigation into whomever happens to be percolating in the polls.
FFS Chuck Todd!?
Yay to Rachel, not sure on Lester Holt, I only really know him from Dateline
The Presidential campaign has become a reality TV show. What nonsense!
The story isnāt entirely clear, but it sounds to me like the same set of moderators will appear both nights. That would mean that both sets of 10 candidates get the same moderators.
Do the Democrats really need 3 moderators for each session? Or are they really questioners? A moderator presides over a meeting. Only one is needed, typically.
All the serious candidates are going to be trying to figure out how to get on Night 2.
Holt did get Trump to admit the real reason he fired Comey was āthe Russia thingā. But Trump seemed eager to say it, soā¦