Discussion for article #238039
Also known as- Clerk gets caught saying something wrong and tries to pass off lame excuse to get out of trouble.
According to KSFY, the clerk told Nelson that there had been a
miscommunication, and the clerk had been talking about her love for her
dog, not the Supreme Courtâs decision.
Aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha âgasp-- Thatâs pretty thin there Pam.
Hmm, as a general rule my dog is smarter, friendlier, and more compassionate than most conservatives; so maybe sheâs trying to be complimentary?
This is yet another conservative admitting that civil unions were not an adequate substitute for marriage.
I donât recall anyone talking about forming civil unions with their pets or other animal of choice when same-sex couples were trying to get at least some of the legal rights of marriage.
Tierney, dearâthere is no such word as âbeastiality.â
The correct term is âbestiality.â
TPM----hire a damned proofreader!!!
A woman waiting in line in the clerkâs office in Sioux Falls, South Dakota â one of the states where same-sex marriage wasnât legal until Fridayâs ruling â says she overheard the clerk comparing gay marriage to beastiality
Itâs âbestialityâ, not âbeastiality.â The fact that most Americans mispronounce it no reason to also misspell it.
Ohhhh⌠so the clerk was talking about her own bestiality?
âyou canât compare beastiality with two consenting adults getting married â theyâre not the same thing.â
Itâs that extra chromosome on which conservatism resides, dear. It prevents the poor little trisomes from sensing irony, dulls all self-awareness and renders them entirely incapable of making accurate analogies.
LOLâŚso she was talking about screwing her pooch, got it. LOL
Thought is free. Speech is not free when Iâm paying your salary and youâre on the clock.
If you donât like working in a place where same-sex couples get marriage licenses, get a new job.
Struck a cord, you say? Like, an electrical cord?
Or use spell check.
What makes these conservatives think their pets would consent to marry them, anyway?
The pets are looking for something like this:
âHer reaction to that was âwell apparently Iâm just going to marry my dog, because we can just marry whoever we want anymore,ââ
Has the dog been consulted on this? I doubt (s)he would go for it.
According to KSFY, the clerk told Nelson that there had been a miscommunication, and the clerk had been talking about her love for her dog, not the Supreme Courtâs decision.
Ralph Kramden, were you bad-mouthing gay marriage again?
Homina-homina-homina!
her own bestie
Santorum,that you?
The clerk is simply repeating a rightwing media meme and has no mind of her own. She is likely to be suffering from the Dunning-Kruger Effect, making her both ignorant and pitiable.
âwell apparently Iâm just going to marry my dog, because we can just marry whoever we want anymore,â
From her comment, Iâm assuming the clerk isnât gay, which tells me sheâs speaking to her knowledge, which must be based on her (ahem) relationship with her dog. Remember, love your dog, donât LOVE your dog.