Discussion: Sessions Denies He Misled Judiciary Committee

This is gonna make Watergate seem like a high school spat.

15 Likes

ā€œā€¦as I understood it at the time.ā€

Oh fuuuuckkk you, buddy.

4 Likes

ā€œMy reply to the question of Sen. Franken was honest and correct as I understood it at the time,ā€ he said.

Nope. Neither honest, nor correct. Not even a close call.

Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ā€˜Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ā€˜There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump’s surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

ā€œNow, again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so you know. But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?ā€

Sessions: ā€œSenator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.ā€

Sessions gave an unqualifed denial of having ā€œcommunications with Russiansā€. Not " Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries" or on the subject of being ā€œpart of a ā€˜continuing exchange of information’ during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian governmentā€.

A complete unqualified blanket denial.

Therefore, a straight-out lie. Perjury.

17 Likes

A lawyerly response but why did he not disclose that he met with the Ambassador?

4 Likes

Quavering, weak…he himself makes the case he’s confused and easily duped. We deserve better.

1 Like

How does he know it’s ā€œfalseā€ given that he claims he can’t remember what he discussed with Putin’s stooges?

3 Likes

Yes, the totally obvious thing was to answer ā€œI did meet with the Russian ambassador twice. The first time we talked about A, B, and C and the second time about D, E, and F. I was of course very careful to speak only in my role as Senator, not anything to do with the next administration, and made it clear to him that that was the case.ā€

He didn’t. He’s covering up.

P.S: I just read what rockgolf wrote. It’s correct. The ā€œandā€ in his reply disconncects the surrogate part (which he did not comment on) from the ā€œdid not have communicationsā€ part.

Worse, later in writing when he had time to carefully consider his statements:

Leahy: Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions: ā€œNo.ā€

So, another chance to point out the ā€œabout the electionā€ bit but he did not, intentionally leaving the impression of no meeting.

He was attempting to end any inquiry right there. If he wasn’t worried about it he would have been forthcoming.

7 Likes

He was a Senator and lawyer of long experience. He should have known saying ā€œI haven’t met with the Russiansā€ without some hedge (1) was going to be caught and (2) gave him no wiggle room. He should be fired for being a really bad lawyer as much as being a really bad liar.

Nothing was served by his lies. He had an easy way out. He should have taken it.

4 Likes

At the end of the press conference, Sessions added: ā€œThat’s what I focused my answer on,ā€ referring to the CNN report. ā€œIn retrospect, I should have slowed down and said, ā€˜But I did meet one Russian official a couple of times.ā€™ā€

Franken didn’t ask Sessions if HE had met with any Russian officials. Sessions volunteered the (false) information that he hadn’t met with any Russian officials. I don’t quite see how slowing down would have led him to give precisely the opposite answer.

3 Likes

Am particularly wondering how it is supposed to be plausible that a senator would be exercising his Armed Services Committee responsibilities (rather than anything involved with his campaign role) by meeting the Russian ambassador on the occasion of the Republican convention. Is perturbing.

3 Likes

To say the least.

1 Like

You can show the calendar and minutes of the meetings—especially the July meeting—to the Special Prosecutor… Madame Special Prosecutor

6 Likes

Basically, he’s a liar (perjurer) or he’s utterly incompetent. Either way, he has no business being the country’s top law man. Regardless of whether there was any ā€œthere, there,ā€ his failure to disclose it is inexcusable and the only responsible course would be his resignation. But I’m not holding my breath on that.

2 Likes

NOT good enough.
you can not have confidence in an AG who commits perjury and can not be trusted to run an investigation.
never mind the total hypocrisy of it all…but…WHAT ELSE is he hiding?

and what is he hindering and protecting the puppet from?
and just why should we believe he isnt?

Democrats MUST continue to call for his resignation ,
he has lost the trust to lead the office he was appointed to.

Coretta Scott King is smiling looking down on this racist.

1 Like

ā€œIn retrospect, I should have slowed down and [not lied].ā€

3 Likes

Lying piece of excrement.

1 Like

You just don’t understand. He said he ā€œdid not have communications with the Russians.ā€ He didn’t deny that he had a conversation with a Russian (the ambassador). And if that doesn’t work for you, he’ll be happy to explain he was referring to a punk rock group called ā€œThe Russians,ā€ which he totally didn’t have any contact with and they totally exist because he heard they do from someone or other though he couldn’t tell you who or when he heard it.

2 Likes

His explanation for his testimony is plausible. That would probably have been the end of the matter. However, I believe (need to see the full transcript) he also made a comment at one point about ambassador’s liking to talk about politics. That would seem to suggest that the campaign may have come up during his meeting in September.

So let me get this straight;

Sessions ā€œdid not do anything wrongā€ and ā€œdid not do what he is accused ofā€

BUT

He is recusing himself ANYWAY?!?!?

Why? If you didn’t do anything, why are you recusing yourself?

I wonder if it was because the FBI was refusing to share any info with him, because HE is under investigation by them.

2 Likes