Discussion: Sean Spicer’s Book Is Apparently ‘Littered With Inaccuracies’

“Littered with inaccuracies”, eh??

That’s a clear signal from the WH that there are far too many truths in the book.

5 Likes

This isn’t a book. It’s a job application for a cushy job with a large corporation or a think tank as communications director…someplace where the truth is the LAST thing you want to be spouting. He is amply prepared.

7 Likes

Except that it’s a reporter who’s saying it.

7 Likes

Please, please, don’t give this clown any more time and publicity than he has already received.
We already know he’s a lying sack of shit, no need to rehash that.

11 Likes

i am shocked, shocked i say, that Spicer would lie in his book. why, the next thing you know, someone might suggest he didn’t tell the truth as press secretary.

16 Likes

Michael Steele, ” who is in truth the former chairman of the Republican National Committee, not the British ex-spy Christopher Steele

lol.

Nothing more to add. Weak (or sick) memory. Bad author!

14 Likes

My bad. You’re right.

That’s what I get for skimming.

My excuse is the extreme heat wave we are in middle of over here – causing misfiring synapses.

5 Likes

Who cares? No one’s going to read it anyway.

3 Likes

20 Likes

AlterNAtive facts, libtards :smirk:

10 Likes

Proof positive that he actually wrote it himself.

17 Likes

Well the TV show didn’t work, let’s see if republican PACs care enough about him to put him onhte best seller list.

1 Like

1 Like

Love that
What’s the deal with the alien conspiracy theorists on the history channel?
I seems that you have to have crazy hair before they let you on.
I love this twit

1 Like

Revenge of the journos. And Spicer, that twit, makes it so easy for them. Like shooting domesticated animals in a penned-in ranch with a sub machine gun.

2 Likes

Its really rich when a journalist that helped college Republicans criticizes your work, particularly when their own inaccuracies have long since come into question. I guess this is Karl’s way of making amends, by distancing himself from these tRumpsters. Not saying he shouldn’t have pointed out Spicer’s inaccuracies, just that the messenger himself has similar problems.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/19/jonathan-karl-benghazi-regrets_n_3302891.html

4 Likes

Not only a reporter - but a reporter from Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal!

His application to be a pundit on Fox News might be in a bit of trouble… but “inaccuracies” haven’t bothered Fox in the past, so we’ll have to wait-and-see.

P.S. It says a lot about his book’s publisher that obvious goofs like referring to Obama as President in 1999 wasn’t caught and corrected.

6 Likes

One man’s inaccuracies are another man’s bald faced lies…

3 Likes

one a tool, always a tool.

1 Like