Discussion for article #222456
The guy issued the death threats because he didnt like âteaching the controversyâ being described as âpropaganda.â
The San Bernardino paper was a bit more in-depth in the coverage, including this little snippet:
âOn Friday, the Los Angeles-based Anti-Defamation League was critical of the April argumentative writing research project and expressed its concerns to Rialto Unifiedâs interim superintendent, Mohammad Z. Islam.â
Shades of the Birmingham Schools âTrojan Horseâ scandal in the UK?
So, until you get caught, itâs ok to speculate as to whether the Holocaust happened? Why would anyone even begin to think that this is something to âspeculateâ on? The only reason that comes to my mind is overt anti-Semitism on an institutional level.
âOriginally, Jafri had defended the assignment to [distort irrefutable facts into a hoax] as an exercise in âdeveloping critical thinking skillsââŚâ
Fox should steal that line for all of its broadcasts.
It was not âthe districtâ who created the assignment but an individual or perhaps several who created the assignment. Who were these ignorant âeducatorsâ, or perhaps they thought it would just be thought provoking to have young teenagers question what historians and survivors have confirmed happened? Thus is born Holocaust deniers.
How about an assignment on whether Jesus ever existed ⌠citing historical evidence.
Holocaust denial is politically odious, but the idea of getting students to think about the level of craziness that is out there is not a bad one. I tend to side with teachers pushing students to think innovatively, so I would support this one.
I do like the idea of teaching kids to think creatively by making them argue an indefensible position. Itâs a good idea, but there are a couple of places you just shouldnât go. Donât have kids debate whether the holocaust happened and donât have them debate the merits of slavery. Doing so rarely ever ends well.
Dare I say that whomever came up with this assignment has neo-nazi tendencies? He/she/them should be quickly identified and fired on the spot.
I would be curious to see what actually happens when high school students debate these issues before I would agree that they donât end well.
Indeed. That individual is hiding and wonât even get a slap on the hand for this. Disgusting.
Correct, stick to debating stuff like the spoils system.
Absent further evidence, that seems an unwarranted assumption.
Eighth graders.
Thanks for providing context.
Why not have them debate whether the earth is flat?
That is FOXâs standard action.
If the assignment had been to discuss and compare the Holocaust vs. those who donât believe it happened, then I would agree. But this doesnât sound like that was what happened.
I lived in Rialto from 1964 to 1970, and went to school from 4th to early 10th grades. This controversy does not surprise me. While there were some fantastic teachers there, many were mediocre at best. The town was mostly just a bedroom community, with everybody working in Berdoo or Colton or Ontario; the school district didnât have a lot of money. And they hired both teachers and administrators accordingly. I can easily see some clueless doofus not thinking through the ramifications of the question.
This is the second time in a year that the Rialto school district has gotten unwanted attention; back in October, one of the accountants was caught embezzling collected lunch money.