IF this is true (and we may never know for sure, but she sounds sincere), then Bristol Palin was physically, verbally — and possibly even sexually – assaulted by a man.
it’s as if her mind can not shift into second gear.
she appears to be incapable of any kind of growth; mentally, she’s a like a five year old kid. jane withers-like. if she has any kind of degree, which i don’t think she does, have $100 that says she doesn’t, it had to be awarded just to make her go away. I would have done it
or else she’s one of the cleverest acts ever known to mankind.
BUT
“My kids aren’t proud of what happened, nor are they seeking sympathy by playing the victim card –…”
BUT
“… it strikes me as bitterly ironic that the same people who tell us there is a ‘war on women’ have no problem laughing at the recording of my daughter crying as she tells police about being assaulted by a man,” Palin said."
So your KIDS don’t have to play the “victim card” because you will do it for them. Got it!
she sure should talk to someone before she sets this stuff in motion on the internet. get someone else, a non-relation, to read it with a critical eye. but. that would be wise and we know she don’t do that.
what she’s done is confirm an awful lot of the, ahem, rumors about what went down.
Question to the cyber community: With the speed with which technologies changes and advances, will there soon be a filter so that any site I access can be rid of all things Palin and/or other indignities I want to avoid?? I am serious. I know that it is the user’s choice as to whether to “click” or not, but can’t we rid ourselves of all of the “junk” ahead of time? A side benefit is that it would “starve the beasts” of the “oxygen” required for them to subsist. Please!
Its not too late. There’s still time to add ten maybe fifteen members to the Palinator Clan. Soon as they’re old enough to throw a punch I’d go back to that infidels house and show him whats what. Get to work Todd.
The best part here, for me, is that she says that she and her family aren’t playing the “victim card,” then in the very next(!) paragraph she gets busy complaining about the media picking on her family.
(It probably isn’t helping her case that she sent out those tweets the day after her family’s brawl pretending that she had been out of town that night. Honestly, it’s like listening to a two year make up stories about how a vase got broken)
Sarah Palin: “My kids aren’t proud of what happened, nor are they seeking sympathy by playing the victim card …”
Bristol Palin: "Imagine for a second the outrage that would happen if Chelsea Clinton had gotten pushed by some guy. Had she tried to defend herself, the liberal media would’ve held her up as some feminist hero.”
What a load of shit both of those articles are. Complete, unadulterated, tapdancing nonsense. Every witness says she walked up to the guy and punched him in the head several times unprovoked and not in any way interpretable as self defense. Dragging her out off the property is not sexual assault any way you define it and even though he was committing an assault in his own right, this nonsense of trying to make this all about abuse of women is just ridiculous. Someone punches you in the head multiple times, they’ve earned the reaction they get regardless of what genitalia they’re packin’. Period. The only one who doesn’t say she punched him the head several times is the shitfaced moron who did it, who probably couldn’t even remember it in the morning and was actively omitting the fact that she punched him several times in her story to the cops. This abuse narrative is nonsense.
Couldn’t resist taking a dump in the comment section of the Daily Caller one.