I do think it is more appropriate to refer to her as simply a journalist. I also think it to be more professional in being interviewed as a journalist for her to make her points without such over the top and obvious anger. That over the top anger in my opinion, overcomes what I believe to be a reasonable point of view she is trying to convey. I believe her concerns to be valid in comparing airtime for each side of the issue concerning the current conflict. I do believe the content of her concerns for example were they to be read in text as can be expressed without the visual and audio volume of anger can garner more focus on the almost mathematical comparison of time allotted to each side in the current conflict. It is my guess she had to try to make the most out of the venue in which she found available to her. I admire her passion while hoping in the future if afforded a similar opportunity she is able to tap into more of the credibility of the logic her point of view and less of the anger. A journalist is a journalist in my point of view and thus a program such as the one she appeared on today labeling her a Palestinian journalist is counter intuitive to being about journalism.
Sheâs still complaining? Please. Spare me.
I donât see any of the other âJournalistsâ on MSNBC being promoted as a âJewish Journalistâ or âIsraeli Journalistâ, do you?
Do they promote Rachel Maddow as a âGay Journalistâ?. Do they promote Chris Matthews as a âLoud-Mouthed Ass-Kissing Journalistâ? Do they promote Melissa Harris-Perry as a âBlack Journalistâ?.
This is just more dog-whistle attacks on her âcredibilityâ by MSNBC and the cowards who run it.
At least she is true to what she sees, unlike the zionists that have paid Dr. Luntz to write their script of obfuscation and liesâŚto confuse the WorldâŚ
But the wheels are coming of with all the zionusts subterfuge and lies revealed:
Paid trolls and lies straight out of the Gop bag playbook.