Hey, good people of CA 48? This is really the best you have? An ignorant Russian mole?
When was Rohrabacher named Propaganda Minister?
My, what this jackass can produce in the way of verbal farts is astounding.
When does the actual GOP intra-party cannibalism occur? Soon?. Please…
It is not the Attorney General’s job to protect the President. The Attorney General works for the people and to protect the Constitution. He is not the president’s personal lawyer.
"Jeff Sessions betrays the people who have had faith in him.”
Says a Russian boot-licking, Putin brown-nosing, Kremlin-toadying, treasonous, backstabbing traitor.
There’s a weird lopsided quality to being an international traitor and a two-bit chiseler too.
That encompasses most of the GOP. Can you be more specific, please?
It’s all about “loyalty” with these people. That is, personal loyalty to der Führer, not to the Constitution of the United States (i.e., the law). Moreover, the “loyalty” only goes in one direction – up.
What people are those, Rorbacher? Putin and his people you mean?
Sessions actually did the right thing which will always puzzle me but it was the right thing for the AG to do, to recuse himself.
Sessions knows how to protect himself apparently.
If anyone is in need of a perp walk it’s this fine upstanding American.
And Sessions is NOT supposed to be loyal to DJT. That’s not his job.
The Cook Political report has him as a Republican toss-up, but I would be shocked, just shocked if the Democrats cannot pick off this poor excuse for a patriot
Here’s the Dec 15 report : https://www.cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-race-ratings
and here’s where SALT matters, even if this guy voted against the tax bill, he is still the party of Trump.
Not a good look, and we California democrats are ready.
Sessions has one job =- to protect and defend the constitution and laws of the United States.
Dana is absolutely right. Jeff Sessions betrayed the trust placed in him. He worked with a foreign government to sway our presidential election and lied to the FBI. Jeff cannot be trusted. Neither can Dana. None of them can be trusted.
So the followup question to Rohrabacher should be, “If Mueller finds a very serious crime that was not predicted within the narrow scope of work you’d prefer he followed – but it’s a real crime! with evidence and witnesses and consequences and everything! – would you demand we ignore it and let the criminal go free?”
“Special prosecutors should be brought in specifically to look at specific actions.”
It will be nice if Mueller’s investigation specifically indicts Rohrabacher for selling out his country to the Russians.
Annnnnd… Putin weighs in.
So why is he looking at the Clinton Foundation and not at the Trump charity which already has admitted to irregularities?