Discussion: Report: Two More Lawyers Decline Teaming Up With Trump Over Conflicts

1 Like

Good. Twitler can’t get no legal relief!! Cases against him are mounting and lawyers are avoiding him like the plauge. #MAGA

Make Attorneys Go Anywhere(else)…?? Make Attorneys Go Away…?

12 Likes

Lawyer: “Mr. Trump, I’d would be honored to represent you, but I have a calendar conflict on your trial date.”
Trump: “There is no trial date!”
Lawyer: “Byeeeeeee! Gotta run!”

23 Likes

Trump (on twitter) : Squawk, squawk, SQUAWLK!!!

Approached for hire lawyers : Balk, balk, (insert nonsense that sounds like flattery), balk!

4 Likes

I think Trump should try for the lawyers with the 1-800 numbers, who advertise on the sides of buses, and hand out cervical collars to clients during the first consultation. Better yet: “There’s no fee, unless we win!”
That’s more Trump’s class and style.

17 Likes

We’d love to represent you Mr. President but we have a rather ironclad rule around here about the expectation of actually being paid for our services, our clients actually acting on our advice and the need to protect our reputation so that we’ll continue to be in business after you have shuffled off this mortal coil. Other than those considerations, we’d love to work with you.

18 Likes

"Two more prominent attorneys have declined to serve on President Donald Trump’s legal team, citing ‘“business conflicts,”’

The conflict being of course, that associating themselves and their firm with a client who

Can

Not

Shut

Up

and follow instructions from counsel will tarnish the firms reputation, and therefore have an adverse affect on their business.

Simples.

14 Likes

“That’s very diplomatic ! You know we have some openings in the State Department ?”

16 Likes

Alexander Vladimirovich Konovalov is available.
You just have to get him a green card under the genius status.
You know how to do that even for imbeciles, aka trophy wives.

7 Likes

The reason they’re declining isn’t simply because he refuses to follow advice. According to several reporters, it’s also due to pressure from current clients and fear that having any association with him will scare off future clients. That’s how horrible the brand has become. Big names don’t even want to be associated with the law firm of an attorney representing PP. I don’t think accused murderers, child molesters, and rapists typically have this much trouble finding an attorney, but this president does. That says a lot.

21 Likes

With a little research, this might make for a nice presentation on cable news.
Take one of those firms which has declined to offer services to Trump, but not because of an ethics obligation, and list various really disreputable people the firm has represented. Something Rachel could do very well, with graphics and boards.

6 Likes

“However they consider the opportunity to represent the President to be the highest honor and they sincerely regret that they cannot do so,” Buchanan and Webb said in a joint statement to The Daily Beast.

Here’s the comment from Winston & Strawn LLP before the Daily Beast edited it for … concision:

However they consider the opportunity to represent the President to be the highest honor and they sincerely regret that they cannot do so for this particular “President.”

12 Likes

And repetition. And more repetition. And even more repetition.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

5 Likes

A kind of reverse Willie Horton, in effect.

4 Likes

Maybe one Vinny Gambini is available to assist?

6 Likes

“However they consider the opportunity to represent the President to be
the highest honor and they sincerely regret that they cannot do so"

Hahahahaha, in other words, “We’d rather stick our heads in shit filled toilets and flush away rather than be in a room with tRUMP.” Hahahahaha!

4 Likes

Lionel Hutz would be a perfect fit. Unfortunately his character was retired 20 years ago when Phil Hartman was killed, and even more unfortunately he was obviously fictional, but I still think they would have had the all-important “chemistry.”

9 Likes

There’s a scene in the beginning of the film ‘Michael Clayton’, in which the rich client of the law firm Michael works for has struck a runner with his car and fled, and wants him to ‘fix’ it. Michael tells him he needs to find a good criminal attorney.

He was trying to mitigate, knowing the client couldn’t win. Lawyers can win, and often do. Many know they can’t, so they mitigate.

My take is Trump’s lawyers all want to mitigate, but Trump wants to win, when they believe he cannot.

7 Likes

The court can appoint counsel for accused murderers and the like and the attorney can’t refuse without being in contempt. When Donnie is finally indicted for a crime, the court can appoint an attorney for him if no one will represent him voluntarily.

Of course, it is possible to get out of a court appointment, but only with difficulty:

3 Likes

Trump is as toxic a client as there could be. It isn’t just his immediate need in connection with the Russia investigation, but it’s all the other things coming to light: the shady business practices, the questionable business connections among his children, the long list of women accusing him of unwanted and non-consensual sexual advances, plus the consensual ones that involve payoffs and possible campaign finance violations.

He doesn’t need a lawyer, he needs a law firm, with lawyers whose specialties cover the range of areas Trump needs counsel on - and that presents another problem: the cost. Yes, Trump is alleged to have all this money, but he also has a reputation for not paying his bills. Assuming the inevitable conflicts could be resolved, is Trump someone who would willingly put up a sizeable retainer to cover ongoing billing? And be willing to put up more when the initial retainer is spent? Because if you have multiple lawyers, at both the partner and associate levels, plus paralegals, document support people, outside experts, those bills are going to accumulate at a dizzying rate.

And even if he could get over these hurdles, there’s the matter of how a firm’s current clients will react, and whether Trump’s association with the firm will bring in the kinds of clients the firm wants to have, or if it attracts the kinds of clients it doesn’t want. Or if too many of its clients decide to go elsewhere.

All things considered, it may be too big a risk.

He’ll find people, but I doubt they will be “the best,” and there’s a better than even chance they won’t be able to see it through to the end.

Can’t say I’m feeling too bad for Trump; this may be just the beginning of the well-deserved karma that’s going to have its very painful way with him.

12 Likes