Of course he was. Mueller? Mueller?
And according to Rachal Maddow last the Russian Bots have been all over the intertubes pushing the Meme.
These fuckers are ⌠are⌠Iâll say it
Colluding with the Russians to destabilize our democracy
At least it appears Wray has the stones to protect his agents from the evil elf and his idiot traitor boss. Maybe the FBI can survive with its independence intact after all.
@mattinpa Ya think? If McCabe actually retires this year, it would put him in a nice position to tell what he knows without fear of retaliation. And I suspect Trumpâs smear attempts have not sat well with him.
Thereâs also been a flood of foreign bots that switched from #SchumerShutdown to #SchumerSellout to sow discord among left-leaning voters.
For my part, Iâll just say that Sessions wouldnât be this enthusiastic if he werenât so afraid of all that perjury he committed a year ago. Roy Moore would make a better AG.
The way the MSM keeps noting that the Russian bots and trolls never stopped supporting Trump without drawing any inferences or conclusions about whether that is, in any way, relevant to the question of whether Trump has been colluding with, or has been coopted by, the Russians is driving me fucking crazy. Itâs the same goddamn âhey, everybody knows that so itâs not newsâ blindspot we saw when they failed to find anything particularly newsworthy about the Downing Street Memo until the dirty fucking hippy blogs and websites (like TPM, as I recall) shamed them into stepping outside the Beltway cocktail weenie sucking CW and actually look at it.
Just keep digging, DonnieâŚ
At the rate youâre going, youâll have your very own coal mine in a week or soâŚ
Theyâre there and we know whose side they are on
Thanks for mentioning this. I would not have thought of it.
Itâs possible but Iâm thinking more generally that when you go to war with the IC theyâre going to come back at you and theyâre not without weapons.
Are you suggesting the IC âgo to warâ against a sitting president?
Are you suggesting that they protect âthis sitting presidentâ?
Is it wrong that my response to this article was âwell, of course he hasâ?
Like the proverbial frog in the water that slowly comes to a boil unaware of its peril, fascism begins a slow creep upon government.
Iâm not suggesting the IC go to war against a hypothetical president because they just donât like him. Iâm suggesting that in this actual particular situation theyâre human beings and will protect themselves with the weapons they have, which are considerable compared to, say, the Department of Agriculture. And they might retaliate not just out of pique over a turf battleâthis particular president is widely suspected to be a huge security threat to this nation and a threat as well to its political system, a thing all of these people have sworn to defend. So if they want to stick a leg out to trip him up, yeah, Iâm good with it.
Protecting the president is not the ICâs job.
Is it the ICâs job to take action against a suspect? Are they empowered by the Constitution or by law?
Well, yeah. Itâs kind of what the FBI does all day, really. 