So, in an administration where over half the 800-some senior appointive positions remain not merely unfilled but un-nominated, Trump finds the time and musters the attentiveness to interview candidates for a single US Attorney position. Why not just put the job up for auction?
Clearly moron thinks running the government is like running a corporation of which he’s the CEO so he gets to pick and choose.
I know well what people are saying about her re-election bid, and most are not pretty, but she’s going to have competition, some very well funded and coming with very respectable credentials, think Tom Steyer, far left billionaire environmentalist and friend of the Obamas.
“In 19 days, the world is going to be looking at New Jersey,”
We’ll want to make sure we’re seeing the hind end of CC for the last time.
As soon as I saw that name, the page started to blink red.
But why does that not surprise me? He’s as corrupt as they come.
Because he wants to control who gets it.
“To be very blunt, these three jurisdictions will have authority to bring indictments over the ongoing special counsel investigation into Trump campaign collusion with the Russians and potential obstruction of justice by the president of the United States,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said in an interview Thursday. “For him to be interviewing candidates for that prosecutor who may in turn consider whether to bring indictments involving him and his administration seems to smack of political interference.”
Southern District of New York, the Eastern District and D.C. Feinstein has said something similar to what Blumenthal’s saying here.
@tena Now we debate who in the senate will oppose these nominees and who it is who wants an unfettered investigation.
U.S. attorneys are also subject to the “blue-slip process,” meaning home-state senators could try to unilaterally block a nominee moving forward.
Yeah that’s going to be interesting. It doesn’t just seem to smack of political interference it looks like classic obstruction of justice to me.
Front, hind neither are pretty.
The most ethical thing an attorney could do would be to lie her/his ass off, tell Tramp exactly what he wants to hear, get the job and then nail his pasty white conman ass to the wall.
(it’s possible I had too much coffee today…)
I bet he did. Oh, to be a fly on the wall. Someone, please make this shit stop!
Slightly off topic, but I take it it would be a step down for Preet to take Cyrus Vance’s position?
It is sleezy as well. Like in a mobbed up way.
O it is - you’re right. As time as passed it’s been increasingly easy to see that most of his tactics are mob tactics.
OT, I finally got to watch the much-talked-about Debya’s speech today in its entirety. What a great relief to hear him say “underestimate” right… 
Seriously, that’s probably one of the best speeches the guy has made (or his speech writer has written). It doesn’t in any way erase his massively negative legacy, but the speech is packed with messages much needed right now. And no matter what we think of the man, it means a lot coming from a living former president.
After reading an article about the speech, I thought to myself, “Well, he’s got better speechwriters than Drumpf.”
Well, isn’t this something. How convenient.
Russia’s Rosneft to take control of Kurdish oil pipeline amid crisis
And if you actually watch it, you will probably conclude he can far better “stay on script” … and I mean literally “stay on script.” He kinda read it out in a monotone and the audience just didn’t seem able to find timings to applaud 
Of course that is not a coincidence…
Yeah that’s just how I feel too.
I was pleased, honestly.
The thing about Trump is the corruption is right in your goddamn face. With the cocktail of malignant narcissism, obsession with dominance, and sheer stupidity, he’s simply not aware that he shouldn’t do that shit and if he’s going to he should be discreet about it. Amazing.