What rhymes with “perjurer?”
Raper?
"Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testified behind closed doors on Tuesday that he has never attended parties during which women were gang raped, according to a Wednesday Time report."
"He reportedly spoke to Judiciary Committee investigators under penalty of perjury."
“That quiet testimony happened one day before, Michael Avenatti’s client Julie Swetnick accused Kavanaugh of touching and trying to remove clothing from women without their consent, and at least being present when Swetnick herself was gang raped at a party.”
Trump will dismiss it - CNN is fake news. And The Base will agree. Sad.
I feel like we’re testing the limits of cognitive dissonance. “BK may or may not be a serial assaulter, sociopathological liar, and all around creep, but he’ll overturn Roe v Wade! Which makes him a saint!” The exact same logic behind the support of DT.
The Base doesn’t matter. Even more Sad!
Trying to understand the timeline. He was asked about attending parties where gang rape occurred BEFORE Avenatti sent all tweets today?
I am so looking forward to Kamala Harris’ questioning of Kavanaugh. Not only is she more intelligent and ethical than Kavanaugh, she was an excellent D.A. for San Francisco. She will hone in on inconsistencies and obfuscations in his testimony.
Yes… and people say Avenatti doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Avenatti had sent the committee a “warning shot” on Sunday evening with a list of questions that he said should be asked of the candidate without revealing who the accuser was that had a lot to do with gang rape.
So how did they know to ask about that in particular? Ah got it Krux. Thanks. I missed that.
It didn’t really get picked up much by the main stream news.
WaPo still doesn’t have “gang rape” in a headline.
But does have an article, “Kavanaugh says he is victim of ‘character assassination’”.
I think they should all yield their respective 5 minutes to Harris, King and Hirono. And divvy up the various loops of the cross examinations.
(adding to what @krux said)
Due to Senator Hirono’s previous question about whether he committed any type of sexual assault, this is his (possibly) second meeting about this topic.
Exactly. The boys waited their turns in line and only one went into the bedroom at a time, so it could not have been gang rape.
SMDH
That might be getting a little trivial.
She will dance circles around him. And then she’ll slice, dice, and puree him.
That’s what I was thinking yesterday. Harris is a skilled prosecutor who has demonstrated many times her abilities to question witnesses on both sides of an issue. She’s also unflappable.
But, we don’t want to send a signal that the men and the other women on the Dems side of the committee can’t handle it with competence and sensitivity (they can). It also might be considered an unfair political advantage for Harris – both she and Booker are considered to have further ambitions politically, and perhaps more of them do.
If the hearing happens as scheduled, I hope the Democrats have come up with their best plan for it. If they could agree to let one person step up to do all the asking, with the understanding that they all will get credit for contributing some of the questions, maybe that would work. I don’t know. All I can say is that they can’t possibly screw it up as much as the merry band of old white men on Grassley’s side.
No, no … That’s the question which was asked to Rob Porter.