Iâm lovinâ itâŚ
âI think if you had various assorted replacement plans, I think you might get everybody to a point where theyâre at least happy with the process,â he said.
Apparently Mr. Paul has not noticed that the Republicans already have various assorted replacement plans. Heck, Ryan alone has proposed various assorted replacement plans. And so far the GOP has failed to even get its own members to a point where theyâre happy with the process.
Câmon, be fair, the GOP has only had seven years or so to come up with a viable ACA alternative.
THis is the kind of BS you hear when they sneak stuff through.
The Democrats donât have to put forward a proposal, dumbass; their proposal is already the law.
So ârepealâ which became ârepeal and replaceâ which became ârepeal and replace with something betterâ has returned to ârepealâ and everyone who was promised they werenât going to lose their insurance are going to lose their insurance.
Essentially âŚ
This shit isnât BAD enough to pass a republican legislature â
TPM needs to clarify this report.
Was Rand Paul wearing his aluminum foil hat when giving this interview or not?
That pretty much sums it up.
Clearly, there is so much #winning right now in the GOP.
While itâs not impossible they will eventually pass a bill, it is looking increasingly likely it wonât be this bill. What is it the Trumpists say about their guy??? Oh, yeah. He gets things doneâŚ
And instead of nibbling around the edges, what weâre going to be arguing, or at least this conservative is going to be arguing, is that we need to have a separate repeal and replace
Um, so let me get this straight: youâve had seven years to come up with an alternative and youâve failed to come together on any of the proposals, despite this being high on your list of priorities the entire time. And weâre supposed to believe that, after youâve repealed the ACA and youâve deprived 20 to 30 million people of their insurance, somehow youâre going to magically be able to come up with a replacement even though you have no idea what that replacement will look like and even though the forces that are preventing agreement on such a replacement today will still be in place at that time? Have I got that right?
Every single GOP Congresscritter is coming up with their own narrowly tailored word salad for their district/state.
Ha!
Oh âŚand this too âŚ
So, reading carefully, Rand Paul hasnât actually said that if the current dogâs breakfast passes the house heâll vote against it. Twit.
I wonder if it would be constitutional to have a blanket ban on anyone running for federal office while one of their parents was still in office.
They donât even have a stated goal.
Like, what is their âalternativeâ designed to do?
Even when they are in power they are still the party of no.
Translation: âThe Freedumb Caucus and I believe the current Bill doesnât do nearly enough harm to nearly enough citizens.â